Northern Metalmark

Calephelis borealis (Grote and Robinson, 1866)

Northern Metalmark
Steve Walter

Insecta (Insects)
Riodinidae (Metalmarks)
State Protection
Not Listed
Not listed or protected by New York State.
Federal Protection
Not Listed
State Conservation Status Rank
Critically Imperiled in New York - Especially vulnerable to disappearing from New York due to extreme rarity or other factors; typically 5 or fewer populations or locations in New York, very few individuals, very restricted range, very few remaining acres (or miles of stream), and/or very steep declines.
Global Conservation Status Rank
Vulnerable globally - At moderate risk of extinction due to rarity or other factors; typically 80 or fewer populations or locations in the world, few individuals, restricted range, few remaining acres (or miles of stream), and/or recent and widespread declines.


Did you know?

The metalmarks are a diverse family of butterflies that mainly occur in the tropics. The northern metalmark is the only species of this family that occurs in New York. Unlike almost all other butterflies, metalmarks often rest flat against the undersides of leaves with the upper surface visible. The metalmark's contrasting orange underside may serve to startle or confuse predators, similar to the colorful hindwings of underwing moths (genus Catocala).

State Ranking Justification

This species has been recently recorded in Dutchess County in 2007 and 2013. The only other documented population statewide was based on collections in Orange County before 1866. The 2007 discovery was the first since the 1860s. This species is globally uncommon to rare and it is very rare in New York.

Short-term Trends

The short-term trends are unknown.

Long-term Trends

The long-term trends are unknown. The species has been reported at three locations in Dutchess County in 2007 and 2013, but has not been reported elsewhere in the state since the 1860s.

Conservation and Management


The main threats would be habitat loss to development, invasive plants, succession, and the isolation of the remaining colonies. It is not known whether the remaining populations are large enough to persist. Deer are also a potentially serious threat. While they do not severely graze the foliage of the foodplant, roundleaf ragwort (Packera [better known as Senecio] obovata), they do eat the flowers which could reduce the foodplant in the long term. Of most immediate concern though is the elimination of nectar sources by deer. This has been observed several times in potential, but unoccupied, habitats in New Jersey. Spongy moth spraying could also be a threat, but the potential sensitivity of larvae to Btk (Bacillus thuringiensis variety kurstaki - a bacterial biological control used on spongy moth caterpillars) is unknown.

Conservation Strategies and Management Practices

Potential management needs include deer management, invasive plant and pest control, and habitat management and restoration. If deer browse is identified as a threat, there are a number of deer management techniques that can be employed. In small areas, tall fencing can prevent deer from browsing on plants. Exclosures should include roundleaf ragwort (Packaera obovata) and nectar sources. If deer browse is a significant issue, consultation with New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is recommended. Invasive species should be controlled to ensure the foodplant and nectar sources remain. Management techniques include mechanical removal, chemical treatment directly to the invasive plant, and some can be eliminated with biocontrols, such as parasites that specially target specific species. Mid to late larval instars of northern metalmark are present at the recommended spraying time of Btk for spongy moth. It is unknown how northern metalmark larvae are affected by Btk, therefore direct spraying is not recommended in areas with known northern metalmark populations. Habitat restoration could include selective logging to open the canopy which would result in suitable habitat for P. obovata and to provide some connectivity to other nearby populations when possible. It would be beneficial to plant nectar souces near P. obovata because northern metalmarks are weak fliers and tend to stay near their foodplant unless there is a shortage of nectar.

Research Needs

Research is needed to determine the affects of Btk (Bacillus thuringiensis variety kurstaki) on northern metalmark larvae. Additional studies are needed to better understand metapopulation dynamics and how selective logging may improve connectivity between subpopulations.



The habitat in New York appears to be openings in wooded limestone ridges with the foodplant roundleaf ragwort (Packaera obovata), but the details are limited. The adults are said to also occur in nearby wetlands as they do in New Jersey. The typical habitats in states adjacent to New York include both natural openings on cliffs, ledges, or very rocky soil and also powerlines. The presence of nectar flowers in July is likely to be crucial and adults that are seen in wetlands may be there in search of nectar.

Associated Ecological Communities

  • Limestone woodland* (guide)
    A woodland that occurs on shallow soils over limestone bedrock in non-alvar settings, and usually includes numerous rock outcrops. There are usually several codominant trees, although one species may become dominant in any one stand.
  • Rich sloping fen (guide)
    A small, gently sloping wetland that occurs in a shallow depression on a slope composed of calcareous glacial deposits. Sloping fens are fed by small springs or groundwater seepage. Like other rich fens, their water sources have high concentrations of minerals and high pH values, generally from 6.0 to 7.8. They often have water flowing at the surface in small channels or rivulets.

* probable association but not confirmed.


New York State Distribution

This species was recently discovered at three locations in Dutchess County. Another known location in New York is from a collection(s) in the 1860s from which the species was first described near Upper Coldenham in Orange County. There is also a record that the species was first discovered along the Delaware River on calcareous ledges (Forbes 1960), however, this may refer to the Upper Coldenham site or possibly south of New York. There appear to have been no other records (Shapiro 1974). This species is not likely to occur much more widely, but more colonies might turn up in the limestone areas of southeastern New York, especially near the New Jersey border. New York and two adjacent Connecticut counties are the northeastern end of the range.

Global Distribution

There are three major population clusters: northwest Connecticut to northwestern New Jersey (extant in Sussex and Warren counties) and Dutchess County in New York; Appalachia from central Pennsylvania through West Virginia then northwest into Ohio-Indiana; Ozark region mainly in Missouri, but Opler (1992) shows range extending into Arkansas and Oklahoma. Published information suggests Ohio may be a stronghold. Records in Shapiro (1966; repeated in most subsequent literature) for southeastern Pennsylvania serpentine barrens are mostly dubious, although a voucher does exist to support the Lima record. Several significant efforts have been made to relocate this species in these barrens with no success.

Identification Comments

Identifying Characteristics

Northern metalmark is a small butterfly 2.9-3-2 cm (1.125 – 1.25 in). Males have a rounded forewing while females have a squared forewing. The upper side of northern metalmark wings are chestnut brown with a pattern of dark median bands. The outer margin has two thin, metallic silver bands with a band of dark spots between them. There is a whitish outer fringe. The underside of the wings is orange with altering black and metallic silver markings. The adult is unmistakable in New York, but is very similar to several species belonging to the same genus occuring in other states. The caterpillar is green with black dots and long white hairs. The larva is similar to the Little Metalmark (Calephelis virginiensis), illustrated by Wagner (2005), but it would occur on or under the foodplant, roundleaf ragwort (Packera obovata). There are numerous other hairy white caterpillars, but the details for Northern Metalmark differ substantially and an experienced Lepidopterist could confirm a mature larva to genus based on Wagner's (2005) illustration and text. In New York, the genus identification of a larva along with the foodplant would confirm the species.

Characters Most Useful for Identification

Note the metallic silver markings on the top of the wings and the orange underside. There are no similar species in New York. The illustration of the larva and the adult in Wagner (2005) of the related Calephelis virginiensis would suffice to recognize northern metalmark in and near New York.

Best Life Stage for Proper Identification

Identification will usually be as an adult, but larvae or photos of them can be identified by an experienced Lepidopterist. The larva would be on or under the foodplant, roundleaf ragwort, however, there are other hairy white caterpillars that use the same plant.


Adults perch on underside of leaves of shrubs or small trees. They are most often seen perched in sunny spots or on flowers. They will move short distances from their main habitats to obtain nectar and perhaps for other reasons.


The larvae eat the leaves of roundleaf ragwort (Packera obovata). The adults take nectar from a variety of flowers.

Best Time to See

In New York, this species has a flight period of about three weeks beginning in late June or July.

  • Present
  • Reproducing
  • Larvae present and active
  • Pupae or prepupae present

The time of year you would expect to find Northern Metalmark present, reproducing, larvae present and active, and pupae or prepupae present in New York.

Northern Metalmark Images


Northern Metalmark
Calephelis borealis (Grote and Robinson, 1866)

  • Kingdom Animalia
    • Phylum Arthropoda (Mandibulates)
      • Class Insecta (Insects)
        • Order Lepidoptera (Butterflies, Skippers, and Moths)
          • Family Riodinidae (Metalmarks)

Additional Resources


Allen, T.J., J.P. Brock, and J. Glassberg. 2005. Caterpillars in the field and garden. Oxford University Press, New York. 232 pp.

Brock, J. P., and K. Kaufman. 2003. Butterflies of North America. Kaufman Focus Field Guides, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY 284 pp.

Forbes, William T. M. 1960. Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states part IV. Cornell University Experiment Station Memoir 371.

Iftner, D. C., J. A. Shuey, and J. V. Calhoun. 1992. Butterflies and Skippers of Ohio. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin. New Series, Vol. 9, no. 1, xii + 212 pp., 40 color plates.

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

O'Donnell, J.E., L.F. Gall., and D.L. Wagner, eds. 2007. The Connecticut Butterfly Atlas. State Geological and Natural History Survey of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford. 376 pp.

Opler, P.A. and V. Malikul. 1992. Eastern Butterflies (Peterson Field Guide). Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 396 pp. + color plates.

Scott, J. A. 1986. The Butterflies of North America: A Natural History and Field Guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford CA. 583 pp.

Shapiro, A.M. 1974. Butterflies and skippers of New York State. Search 4:1-60.

Shapiro, Arthur M. 1966. Butterflies of the Delaware Valley. The American Entomological Society. Special Publication. 79pp.

Wagner, D.L. 2005. Caterpillars of eastern North America. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey. 512 pp.


About This Guide

This guide was authored by: Dale Schweitzer and Hollie Y. Shaw

Information for this guide was last updated on: June 28, 2018

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. Online Conservation Guide for Calephelis borealis. Available from: Accessed May 26, 2024.