Common Loon (Gavia immer) Matthew D. Schlesinger

Common Loon (Gavia immer)
Matthew D. Schlesinger

Aves (Birds)
Gaviidae (Loons)
State Protection
Special Concern
Listed as Special Concern by New York State: at risk of becoming Threatened; not listed as Endangered or Threatened, but concern exists for its continued welfare in New York; NYS DEC may promulgate regulations as to the taking, importation, transportation, or possession as it deems necessary.
Federal Protection
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act implements various treaties and conventions between the U. S. and Canada, Japan, Mexico and the former Soviet Union for the protection of migratory birds. Under this Act, taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds, including nests or eggs, is unlawful unless specifically permitted by other regulations.
State Conservation Status Rank
Apparently Secure in New York - Uncommon in New York but not rare; usually widespread, but may be rare in some parts of the state; possibly some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.
Global Conservation Status Rank
Secure globally - Common in the world; widespread and abundant (but may be rare in some parts of its range).


Did you know?

Loons are considered to be ancient birds because their fossil history goes back tens of millions of years to the Eocene Epoch. Nevertheless, at least 11 other families of birds were already in existence by this time (Storer 1988).

State Ranking Justification

Common Loons are a species of Special Concern in the State. Their breeding distribution within New York is restricted primarily to deep productive lakes in the Adirondacks, and although they have recovered from a notable decline since the 1970s they remain vulnerable to persistent and ongoing threats on both their breeding and wintering ranges in the northeastern U.S. The large Adirondack population, increasing popualtion size, and moderate threat levels contributed to the S4 rank. The rank was calculated using the Element Rank Estimator, version 6.03.

Short-term Trends

The abundance of loons in New York has remained relatively stable over the the past 50 years with the population fluctuating between about 200 and 300 breeding pairs. The current population size has rebounded back to the levels of the early 1960s after a marked decline during the 1970s. In the early 1960s Arbib (1963) reported 120 pairs at 90 locations and estimated the population to be between 240 and 360 breeding pairs. In 1977-1978, a survey of over 300 lakes in the Adirondacks conducted by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation found 105 territorial pairs on 83 lakes and estimated the population at fewer than 200 pairs. In 1984-1985, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation surveyed 557 lakes in the Adirondacks and found 157 breeding pairs on 128 lakes. An additional 247 non-breeding adults were also found. From this study, the northern New York loon population was estimated at 216-270 breeding pairs (Parker et al. 1986). Although a statewide census has not been conducted in New York since the mid 1980s, neighboring Vermont has closely tracked a steady increase in their loon population between 1981-2005 (Hanson et al. 2005).

Likewise, the distribution of loons in New York has expanded since the early 1980s. A comparison of the first and second BBAs shows a 42% increase in occupancy. In the first Atlas, loons were reported primarily from the central Adirondacks, western Adirondack Foothills, and Adirondack High Peaks. In the second Atlas, there were reports of Common Loons in previously unreported lakes in all directions. There was an increase in the number of reports from Lake Champlain, the St. Lawrence River area, and the eastern and southern Adirondacks, extending into the eastern Adirondack Foothills. Particularly noteworthy were records of confirmed breeding in central and western New York on Chautauqua, Keuka, and Skaneateles lakes (McGowan and Corwin 2008).

Long-term Trends

Information on the historical status of loon populations in New York is scanty. Loons are believed to have been more widely distributed in the early 1800s because in addition to the core of their range in the Adirondacks, loons most likely bred on most of the Finger Lakes as well as along the shores of Lake Ontario (Arbib 1963, McIntyre 1979). Shooting of adult birds and harrassment of breeding pairs in the mid and late 1800s contributed to a severe decline (McIntyre 1979) so that by the turn of the century, very few Common Loons were reported by Eaton (1910) in the Adirondacks. With a change of attitudes and legal protection, loon populations had rebounded by the early 1960s and during the 2000 BBA, loons had expanded their range and were once again found breeding on some of the Finger Lakes (McGowan and Corwin 2008).

Conservation and Management


Although the population of breeding loons in New York is stable or slightly increasing, several threats are currently acting in combination to negatively affect loons in New York State. Mercury poisoning is one of the most significant threats. Elemental mercury released from sources such as waste incinerators and coal-fired power plants mostly in the Midwest is deposited by atmospheric currents and is transformed in water bodies into methylmercury, a neurotoxin. Common Loons are particularly affected by this process because they are predators at the top of a long aquatic food chain. In loons, high mercury levels are correlated with behavioral changes that lead to lowered reproductive success, decreased survival, and increased susceptibility to other diseases. Preliminary results indicate that 25% of loons sampled in the central Adirondacks had mercury levels high enough to result in behavioral changes and/or decreased reproductive success, and the Adirondacks are considered a biological mercury hotspot (Evers et al. 2007). In addition, lake acidification increases the availability of methylmercury and also leads to a decrease in the diversity and abundance of prey for loons in affected water bodies (Schoch and Evers 2002). Ingestion of lead fishing tackle causes lead poisoning and eventually death, and ingestion of fish hooks and entanglement in fishing line can also cause permanent injury or death. Of 105 Common Loons found dead or debilitated in New York from 1972-1999, 21% of the pathologies were attributed to ingestion of lead fishing weights, while 23% had aspergillosis (Stone and Okoniewski 2001). Oil spills pose a threat for loons that are migrating or that are on their wintering grounds along the Atlantic coast. Loons are also susceptible to human disturbances at breeding lakes. These include effects of shoreline development, which may reduce the suitability of lakes for nesting, and disturbances caused by paddlers, campers, boaters, and jet-skiers, which can interrupt incubation and result in nest failure or abandonment. Loon nests may be affected by water fluctuations as well, which may flood nests or leave nests more vulnerable to predation. Illegal shooting along the Atlantic coast and elsewhere is a known mortality factor. Increasing numbers of predators such as raccoons, otters, and eagles could also pose a threat. Common Loons are also susceptible to several diseases including type C and type E botulism. Since 2000, an outbreak of Type E botulism, Clostridium botulinum, has occurred annually on Lake Erie. Outbreaks on Lake Ontario were documented beginning in 2002. These outbreaks are apparently killing migrating loons (over 10,500 birds from 2000-2005) mostly from the eastern Canadian Provinces and the upper Midwest because Adirondack loons appear to migrate directly to offshore wintering areas along the coast of Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and New Jersey (Kenow et al. 2006).

Conservation Strategies and Management Practices

Common Loons can adapt to moderate levels of lakeshore development and recreational use, but it is important to minimize disturbance to nesting loons (Spillman 2006). Disturbed incubating loons may not return to their nests for an hour or more, leaving eggs vulnerable to predation and cooling (McIntyre 1975, Titus and VanDruff 1981). Nesting areas should be located and protected. Small islands (those less than 5 ha) and deadwaters should not be developed at all, and buffer zones of 150 m should be left undisturbed on either side of mainland nest sites and deadwater entrances (Strong and Bissonette 1985). Nursery areas of lakes (shallow areas and coves where adults raise and collect food for their chicks) should also not be disturbed. Jet skis currently are the most threatening disturbance to chicks because they are fast, highly maneuverable, and able to run in shallow water where loon nests and nurseries are often located (McIntyre and Barr 1997). Motorboats may affect loons more negatively than canoes. Boat engine horsepower should be limited and speed limits should be established on smaller breeding lakes or in designated areas of larger lakes. Loons defending their territories through behaviors such as the penguin dance or vocalizations such as the tremolo (laughing call) should be given their space. Non-lead sinkers and jigs should always be used when fishing, and snagged tackle should be recovered. Human-caused water level fluctuations should be minimized, especially during the peak nesting period of mid-May to mid-July, as nests can be lost to inundation or increased exposure to predators from drawdown. Rises in water levels are more detrimental than drawdowns, especially when they occur late in the season when the loons have little possibility of re-nesting (Strong and Bissonette 1985). In the Adirondacks, excellent natural nesting sites are available, and these are preferred over artificial nest rafts, but artificial rafts may improve nesting success under certain conditions (e.g., lakes with a breeding history experiencing fluctuating water levels and recent repeated failed nesting attempts). Information regarding raft construction design and placement recommendations can be obtained from the North American Loon Fund (McIntyre and Barr 1997).

Research Needs

Considerable research has been conducted on the Common Loon, as it is an iconic species and excellent indicator of trends in environmental quality. Current research is focused on detecting population trends, effects of mercury pollution on reproductive success, and use of migratory routes and wintering areas. These efforts should be continued in order to gather information on the long-term effects of acidification, environmental pollutants, and human interactions. Population monitoring and contaminant research is being coordinated with other efforts in the Northeast to enable an assessment of the effects of mercury and other factors on northeastern loon populations. Continuing such monitoring efforts will enable the early detection of unusual changes in population levels and the implementation of appropriate management efforts as well as assist in the development of appropriate policies regarding mercury and other contaminants (Schoch and Evers 2002). The mechanism of the type E botulism outbreaks affecting migrating loons on the Great Lakes is still poorly understood, and additional research is needed to determine the causes of the outbreaks, and how they can be prevented or minimized (Schoch 2002). Further study is also needed on the sensitivity of loons to toxins (McIntyre and Barr 1997), ecology of wintering loons (Rimmer 1992), and life history of juveniles between the time they fledge and return to northern lakes (Holst 2005). The inexperienced juveniles apparently do not migrate with the adults and require suitable stopover waterbodies on their way to the coast.



Common Loons breed on a wide variety of lakes and reservoirs in the Adirondacks ranging from oligotrophic (low-nutrient) to eutrophic (high-nutrient), small to large, shallow to deep, clear to turbid, and remote to heavily developed (Rimmer 1992). Breeding has been documented on lakes as small as 4 ha, but loons typically nest on lakes 20 ha or larger (McIntyre 1975). Lakes smaller than 80 ha often support only a single pair (McIntyre 1988). Common Loons often breed on lakes that contain both shallow and deep water areas. Shallow areas are important for feeding and brood rearing, and deeper areas provide escape cover for incubating adults. Nests are often located as close as possible to deep water, on the edge of an island or low hummock, or on rocks, logs, or pieces of bog mat (McIntyre 1988). Since loons are visual feeders, water clarity is also an important component of breeding habitat selection (McIntyre 1975, McIntyre 1988). Nonbreeding habitat is primarily seacoasts, bays, inlets, and estuaries, less frequently along lakes and rivers, and occasionally up to 100 km off the coast (AOU 1998).

Associated Ecological Communities

  • Bog lake/pond (guide)
    the aquatic community of a dystrophic lake that typically occurs in a small, shallow basin (e.g., a kettehole) that is protected from wind and is poorly drained. These lakes occur in areas with non-calcareous bedrock or glacial till; many are fringed or surrounded by a floating mat of vegetation (in New York usually either bog or poor fen).
  • Eutrophic dimictic lake
    The aquatic community of a nutrient-rich lake that occurs in a broad, shallow basin. These lakes are dimictic: they have two periods of mixing or turnover (spring and fall); they are thermally stratified in the summer, and they freeze over and become inversely stratified in the winter.
  • Meromictic lake (guide)
    The aquatic community of a relatively deep lake with small surface area that is so protected from wind-stirring that it has no annual periods of complete mixing, and remains chemically stratified throughout the year. These lakes may be protected from mixing by a sheltered surrounding landscape (e.g., a deep basin) or by adjacent tree cover.
  • Mesotrophic dimictic lake
    The aquatic community of a lake that is intermediate between an oligotrophic lake and a eutrophic lake. These lakes are dimictic: they have two periods of mixing or turnover (spring and fall); they are thermally stratified in the summer, and they freeze over and become inversely stratified in the winter.
  • Oligotrophic dimictic lake (guide)
    The aquatic community of a nutrient-poor lake that typically occurs in a deep, steeply-banked basin. These lakes are dimictic: they have two periods of mixing or turnover (spring and fall), they are thermally stratified in the summer, and they freeze over and become inversely stratified in the winter.
  • Oligotrophic pond
    The aquatic community of a small, shallow, nutrient-poor pond. The water is very clear, and the bottom is usually sandy or rocky.
  • Summer-stratified monomictic lake
    The aquatic community of a lake that is so deep (or large) that it has only one period of mixing or turnover each year (monomictic), and one period of stratification. These lakes generally do not freeze over in winter (except in unusually cold years) or form only a thin or sporadic ice cover during the coldest parts of midwinter, so the water circulates and is isothermal during the winter.
  • Winter-stratified monomictic lake
    The aquatic community of a large, shallow lake that has only one period of mixing each year because it is very shallow in relation to its size, and is completely exposed to winds. These lakes typically never become thermally stratified in the summer, and are only stratified in the winter when they freeze over, and become inversely stratified (coldest water at the surface). They are eutrophic to mesotrophic.

Associated Species

  • Common Merganser (Mergus merganser)


New York State Distribution

Breeding loons are mostly restricted to the Adirondack Mountains, St. Lawrence Valley, and Lake Champlain. There are a few scattered records in the Tug Hill Plateau and in central New York. An apparent range expansion has occurred since the mid 1980s (McGowan and Corwin 2008). Especially noteworthy are the newly confirmed breeding records on Chautauqua, Keuka, and Skaneateles lakes in central and western New York. During the summer months nonbreeding loons can be found outside of the typical breeding range on large inland waterbodies and off the coast of Long Island. Migratory birds can be found throughout the state with an important flyway over the Finger Lakes. Wintering birds are typically found along the Atlantic Coast, but rarely on the Great Lakes (Levine 1998).

Global Distribution

The breeding range of the Common Loon extends from Iceland and Greenland across Canada and the northern United States to Alaska, south to California, Montana, North Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, southern New England, and Nova Scotia (AOU 1983). Non-breeding loons are mainly found along the Pacific coast from Aleutians to Baja California and Sonora, along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts from Newfoundland to Florida and west to Texas, and in western Palearctic along the Atlantic coast to northwestern Africa (AOU 1983). In North America, wintering Common Loons are most concentrated along the South Carolina coast, around Vancouver Island, in northern California, along the Gulf Coast adjacent to the Florida panhandle, and along the Atlantic seaboard from Massachusetts to Maine (Root 1988).

Best Places to See

  • Lows Lake (St. Lawrence County)
  • Indian Lake (Hamilton County)

Identification Comments

Identifying Characteristics

Male and female Common Loons are similar in appearance. Body length ranges from 61 to 91 cm and weight ranges from 2.5 to 6.1 kg, with males being larger and heavier than females (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Evers 2004). Common Loons go through several molt phases per year in which the plumage changes from definitive alternate (breeding) to basic (non-breeding) (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Evers 2004). ADULTS: In definitive alternate (breeding) plumage exhibited during the spring and summer, the head and neck are black with a slight greenish sheen. Around the throat is a prominent band of short, white streaks, with longer streaks on the sides of the neck. The bill is black, and the iris is red. The back is black with white squarish spots on the tip of each feather except for the tail. The spots are small on the back and rump and large on the scapular feathers. The underside is white with the uppermost sides of the breast streaked black and white. The tail is short and black. The wings are black, narrow, and pointed, with the tips of the inner secondaries and coverts possessing white spots, sometimes in pairs. The lining of the wings are white. The legs are black with the webbed feet being whitish above and black below (Palmer 1962, Jackson 1976, Johnsgard 1987, McIntyre 1988, McIntyre and Barr 1997, Schoch 2002, Evers 2004). In basic (non-breeding) plumage exhibited during the fall and winter, the bill is grayish with a little black on the top portion. The entire body plumage becomes grayish-brown. The underbelly remains white and continues up the front of the neck to the chin. The tail feathers are dark brown with white tips (Bent 1919, Johnsgard 1987, McIntyre 1988, McIntyre and Barr 1997, Schoch 2002, Evers 2004). JUVENILES: At the time of hatching, chicks are covered with blackish down with a white underbelly. They gradually molt and acquire their juvenile plumage, which resembles the adult basic non-breeding plumage with a few subtleties: The back and scapular feathers are rounded and have pale edges, the bill is gray, and the tips of the tail feathers are grayish-brown instead of white (McIntyre 1988, McIntyre and Barr 1997, Schoch 2002, Evers 2004). NESTS: Nests are almost always built near the water's edge on lake shores or islands in areas that are sheltered from the wind (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Evers 2004). Floating sphagnum mats and hummocks are also utilized, along with tops of beaver lodges or muskrat dens (Sutcliffe 1980, McIntyre and Barr 1997, Evers 2004). Artificial nesting platforms can be used as well (McIntyre and Barr 1997). Nest materials consist of nearby vegetation and are somewhat bowl shaped. Nests are large with outside diameters ranging from 50-60 cm (Olson and Marshall 1952, McIntyre and Barr 1997). Nests can be reused in following years with new nest material being added (McIntyre and Barr 1997). EGGS: The eggs are oval to subelliptical in shape and the color varies from dark olive to light brown with irregular dark spots (McIntyre and Barr 1997). Average dimensions for New York loon eggs are 91 x 57 mm (McIntyre 1988). VOCALIZATIONS: Common Loons have a variety of vocalizations. The most commonly known are the yodel, given only by the male to indicate territory establishment, the wail (similar to the howling of a wolf), expressing the need for the loons to move closer together, and tremolo or laughing call, which is often produced in times of disturbance. Calling primarily takes place at night and is usually a combination of the above sounds (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Schoch 2002). Daytime tremolo calls are typically given when there is human disturbance nearby (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Schoch 2002).

Characters Most Useful for Identification

Their generally large size, thick, heavy bill and unique black and white plumage distinguishes the Common Loon from other waterbirds.

Best Life Stage for Proper Identification

Adults in breeding plumage.


The Common Loon is highly adapted to aquatic living. They have thick dense bones that act as ballast when diving; however, this makes taking off from land unattainable. Loons require long runways in open water, usually 30 to 200 m for take off, and may become stranded on ice- covered lakes. The loons' webbed feet are also adapted for life in the water being located towards the posterior of the body to aid in swimming and diving. This tradeoff makes walking on land difficult. While day- old chicks are able to walk upright, they quickly lose this ability and by three weeks of age, juveniles assume the posture of the adults. Adults rarely come to shore except to mate and nest. Loons establish pair bonds for the season. Courtship displays are subtle and quiet and consist of head turns with the bill pointed downward and short simultaneous dives (McIntyre and Barr 1997). The males select the location of the nest site and birds having more years of experience in a particular territory had higher levels of nest success (Piper et al. 2008). Loons are thought to nest on the edge of deep water so they can slip into the water inconspicuously if threatened by a predator (Schoch 2002). Studies have shown that nests on islands, floating vegetation, or floating artificial structures increase reproductive success compared with shoreline locations where potential predators have easier targets (McIntyre and Barr 1997). Nests are constructed of wet, matted vegetation, and successful nesting locations and nests may be reused from year to year. Chicks are semiprecocial at hatching and able to leave the nest the first day. They often catch a ride on their parents' backs although they are active and able to swim. Chicks are brooded and fed by both parents and reared in a sheltered nursery area of the lake (Schoch 2002). Adult loons are territorial for the breeding season and spend the majority of their time alone or in pairs. However, for a brief time at the end of summer loons begin to stage up for migration and may be seen gathered in flocks of 10-20 individuals (Schoch 2002). Upon returning from over-wintering along the coast, loons migrating to breeding grounds in the Adirondacks arrive first on large lakes such as Lake Champlain. They will spend part of the spring there, making excursions to smaller breeding lakes and ponds as the ice melts before generally returning (80% of individuals) to establish breeding territories on the same lake every year (Evers 2001, Schoch 2002). Breeding territories may be very large, approaching 80 ha. Large lakes may support multiple pairs while smaller lakes less than 7 ha may also be used and more than one lake may be defended. Loons frequently defend both a smaller breeding lake and other adjacent lakes which constitutes the entire territory (Piper et al. 1997). Common Loons are highly territorial among conspecifics and also may attack other loons and waterfowl including grebes and Common Mergansers (Schoch 2002). Productivity appears to be density dependent. Lower density loon populations such as New York's (McIntyre 1988) often have higher productivity rates than populations at higher densities. The productivity rate of Adirondack loons in 1984-85 averaged 0.96 fledglings/nesting pair, one of the highest rates in North America with about 53% of the nests fledging young (Trivelpiece et al. 1979, Parker et al. 1986).


The Common Loon's diet consists almost entirely of fish, but also includes crustaceans (especially crayfish), and aquatic invertebrates. Loons are visual feeders, diving for their food and opportunistically taking prey that are the easiest to catch and most abundant (Schoch 2002). On breeding lakes, one of the primary foods is the Yellow Perch (Perca flavescens), followed by other warm water fish and minnows (Cyprinidae) (McIntyre 1986). Adults feed their chicks small crayfish, sunfish, and minnows. On the Great Lakes, alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) appear to be the most common prey item. In the winter, loons are reported to eat flounder, herring, and crustaceans (McIntyre 1988). Acid deposition reduces prey abundance for loons and mobilizes heavy metals into the food chain. However, decreasing pH also increases water transparency which likely contributes to higher foraging efficiency (Evers 2004). Studies on breeding lakes in Ontario have documented that fledging success is highly unlikely at a lake pH of 4.0-4.3, and high brood mortality occurs at pH levels of 4.4-5.8 (especially on smaller lakes). About a third of the lakes in the Adirondacks have pH levels below 5.6, mainly in the western part of the park where acid rain is most intense and the neutralizing capacity of the substrate is lowest (Jenkins and Keal 2004). Loons are particularly susceptible to mercury poisoning through food chain biomagnification. The concentration of methylmercury in a large yellow perch may be up to 20 million times the concentration in the water, and the concentration of methylmercury in a loon is about 10 times that of its prey. In sampled Adirondack lakes, the average level of mercury in older Yellow Perch was approximately 1.0 ppm, a level considered to be hazardous (Jenkins and Keal 2004).

Best Time to See

Summer in the Adirondack Park is the best time to see loons in New York. They can be found on many of the lakes in western Essex, northern Herkimer and Hamilton Counties, and southern Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties during peak nesting season, which is typically June and July (McIntyre and Barr 1997, Evers 2004). The birds arrive from their wintering grounds in late March and April, heading for large lakes with open water, since many of the breeding lakes can still be covered with ice. After ice out, they return to their breeding lakes and remain there until just before the lakes freeze (Schoch 2002). The birds begin their migration back to their wintering grounds in the fall between October and November. The migration routes of Common Loons from more northerly parts of their range in the upper Midwest and Canada take them over Lakes Erie and Ontario and the Finger Lakes region of New York (Schoch 2002, Evers 2004). Common Loons are often spotted overwintering off the coast of Long Island (Evers 2004).

  • Active
  • Reproducing
  • Eggs present outside adult

The time of year you would expect to find Common Loon active, reproducing, and eggs present outside adult in New York.

Similar Species

  • Yellow-billed Loon (Gavia adamsii)
    The Common Loon's closest relative breeds exclusively in the high Arctic and winters along the Pacific coast.
  • Red-throated Loon (Gavia stellata)
    Could be confused with wintering Common Loons as plumage is somewhat similar, however the Common Loon's bill is much thicker and heavier.
  • Common Merganser (Mergus merganser)
    Adult mergansers are only about 1/3 to 1/4 the size of loons and usually swim along the shoreline in groups.
  • Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus)
    Adult Cormorants are all black, and have a very stiff tail that stands upright when swimming.
  • Red-necked Grebe (Podiceps grisegena)
    Could be confused with wintering loons as plumage is similar, but loons are 2-3 times larger.

Common Loon Images


Common Loon
Gavia immer (Brunnich, 1764)

  • Kingdom Animalia
    • Phylum Craniata
      • Class Aves (Birds)
        • Order Gaviiformes (Loons)
          • Family Gaviidae (Loons)

Additional Resources


Alvo, R., D. J. T. Hussell, and M. Berril. 1988. The breeding success of common loons (GAVIA IMMER) in relation to alkalinity and other lake characteristics in Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 66:746-752.

American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.

American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online:

Andrle, Robert F. and Janet R. Carroll, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell University Press. 551 pp.

Arbib, R.S. Jr. 1963. The common loon in New York State. Kingbird 13:132-140.

Barr, J. F. 1973. Feeding biology of the common loon (GAVIA IMMER) in oligotrophic lakes of the Canadian shield. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Ph.D. dissertation.

Belant, J. L., and J. F. Olson. 1991. Chick fostering by common loons, GAVIA IMMER. Can. Field-Nat. 105:406-407.

Belant, J. L., and R. K. Anderson. 1991. Common loon, GAVIA IMMER, brood habitat use in northern Wisconsin. Can. Field-Nat. 105:372-375.

Bent, A.C. 1919. Life histories of North American diving birds. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 107. Washington, D.C.

Blair, R. 1991. Loon conservation: acidified lakes & habitat selection. Center for Conservation Biology Update 5(2):6.

Bull, John. 1974. Birds of New York State. Doubleday, Garden City, New York. 655 pp.

Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.

Dunning, J. 1986. The loon: voice of the wilderness. Yankee. 144 pp.

Eaton, E.H. 1910. Birds of New York. Part 1. New York: University of State of New York. Albany, NY.

Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.

Evers, D. C. 1995. Isle Royale loons. Park Science, Winter 1995, pp. 20-21.

Evers, D.C. 2001. Habitat-specific between year territory fidelity by breeding adult Common Loons. Pp. 57-101 in D.C. Evers. Common Loon Population Studies: Continental Mercury Patterns and Breeding Territory Philopatry. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Minnesota. St. Paul, MN.

Evers, D.C. 2004. Status assessment and conservation plan for the common loon (Gavia immer) in North America. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA.

Evers, D.C., Y.J. Han, and C.T. Driscoll. 2007. Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and Canada. Bioscience 57:29-43.

Gerrard, J. M., et al. 1993. Water-bird population changes in 1976-1990 on Besnard Lake, Saskatchewan: increases in loons, gulls, and pelicans. Can. J. Zool. 71:1681-1686.

Hands, H. M., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status of the common loon in the northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish Wildl. Res. Unit Rep. 26 pp.

Haney, J. C. 1990. Winter habitat of common loons on the continental shelf of the southeastern United States. Wilson Bull. 102:253-263.

Hanson, E.W, C.C. Rimmer, and S.G. Parren. 2005. The 2005 Breeding status of Common Loons in Vermont. Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, Waterbury, VT.

Jackson, J. A. 1976. Countershading on the feet and legs of the common loon. Auk 93:384-6.

Jenkins, J. and A. Keal. 2004. The Adirondack atlas: a geographic portrait of the Adirondack Park.

Johnsgard, P. A. 1987. Diving birds of North America. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. xii + 292 pp.

Jung, R. E. 1991. Effects of human activities and lake characteristics on the behavior and breeding success of common loons. Passenger Pigeon 53(3):207-218.

Kenow, K.P., D. Adams, and N. Schoch. 2006. Migration patterns and wintering range of Common Loons breeding in New York State. Final Report, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, LaCrosse, WI.

Levine, E. 1998. Bull's birds of New York State. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, NY.

McEneaney, T. 1991. The uncomon loon. Flagstaff, Northland. 112 pp.

McGowan, K.J. and K. Corwin, eds. 2008. The Second Atlas of Breeding Birds in New York State: 2000-2005. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. 688 pp.

McIntyre, J. W. 1975. Biology and behavior of the common loon (GAVIA IMMER) with reference to its adaptability in a man-altered environment. University of Minnestoa, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ph.D. dissertation.

McIntyre, J. W. 1979. Status of common loons in New York from a historical perspective. Pages 117-22 in S. Sutcliffe (editor). Proceedings of the Second North American Conference on Common Loon Research and Management, National Audubon Society, New York, New York.

McIntyre, J. W. 1986. Common loon. Pages 679-95 in R. L. Di Silvestro (editor). Audubon Wildlife Report 1986. National Audubon Society, New York, New York.

McIntyre, J. W. 1988. The common loon: spirit of northern lakes. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. x + 200 pp.

McIntyre, J.W. and J.F. Barr. 1997. Common loon (Gavia immer) No. 313. In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32p.

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 2005. Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Planning Database. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY.

Olson, S. T., and W. H. Marshall. 1952. The common loon in Minnesota. Minnesota Mus. Nat. Hist., Occas. Paper No. 5, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Palmer, R. S. (editor). 1962. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 1. Loons through flamingos. Yale University Press, New Haven. 567 pp.

Parker, K. E., R. L. Miller, and S. Islil. 1986. Status of the common loon in New York State. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Delmar, New York. Unpublished report.

Parker, K. E., and R. L. Miller. 1988. Status of New York's common loon population--comparison of two intensive surveys. Pages 145-56 in P. I. V. Strong (editor). 1987 Conference on Common Loon Research and Management. North American Loon Fund, Meredith, New Hamphire.

Parker, K.E. 1985. Foraging and reproduction of the common loon (Gavia immer) on acidified lakes in the Adirondack Park, New York. Unpublished M.S. thesis. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.

Piper, W.H., C. Walcott, J.N. Mager, and F.J. Spilker. 2008. Nest site selection by male loons leads to sex- biased site familiarity. Journal of Animal Ecology 77:205-210.

Piper, W.H., J.D. Paruk, D.C. Evers, M.W. Meyer, K.B. Tischler, M. Klich, and J.J. Hartigan. 1997. Local movements of color-marked Common Loons. Journal of Wildlife Management 61:1253-1261.

Rimmer, C. C. 1992. Common loon, GAVIA IMMER. Pages 3-30 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.

Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.

Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2001. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2000. Version 2001.2, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Available at:

Schoch, N. and D.C. Evers. 2002. Monitoring mercury in common loons: New York field report, 1998-2000. Report BRI 2001-01 submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. BioDiversity Research Institute, Falmouth, ME.

Schoch, Nina. 2002. The common loon in the Adirondack Park: an overview of loon natural history and current research. Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper No. 20.

Spillman, C.A. 2006. The effects of lakeshore development on Common Loon productivity in the Adirondack Park, New York. M.S. Thesis, SUNY CESF, Syracuse, NY.

Stallcup, R. 1994. Focus: loons. Point Reyes Bird Observatory, Fall 1994, pp. 6-7.

Stone, W.B., and J.C. Okoniewski. 2001. Necropsy findings and environmental contaminants in Common Loons from New York. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37:178-184.

Storer, R. W., 1988. Variation in the common loon (GAVIA IMMER). Pages 54-65 in P. I. V. Strong (editor). 1987 Conference on Common Loon Research and Management. North American Loon Fund, Meredith, New Hampshire.

Strong, P. I. V. 1990. The suitability of the common loon as an indicator species. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18:257-261.

Strong, P. I. V., J. A. Bissonette, and J. S. Fair. 1987. Reuse of nesting and nursery areas by common loons. J. Wildl. Manage. 51:123-127.

Strong, P. I. V., and J. A. Bissonette. 1985. Management considerations for common loons in Maine. Maine Coop. Wildl. Res. Unit, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Orono, Maine. Unpublished report.

Strong, P. I. V., and J. A. Bissonette. 1989. Feeding and chick-rearing areas of common loons. J. Wildl. Manage. 53:72-76.

Sutcliffe, S. A. 1980. Aspects of the nesting ecology of common loons in New Hampshire. University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire. M.S. thesis.

Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Titus, J. R., and L. W. VanDruff. 1981. Response of the common loon to recreational pressure in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, northeastern Minnesota. Wildl. Monogr. No. 79:1-59.

Trivelpiece, W., S. Brown, A. Hicks, R. Fekete, and N. H. Volkman. 1979. An analysis of the distribution and reproductive success of the common loon in the Adirondack Park, New York. Pages 45-5 in S. Sutcliffe (editor). Proceedings of the Second North American Conference on Common Loon Research and Management. National Audubon Society, New York, New York.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: the 1987 list. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: The 1995 list. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 22 pp.


About This Guide

Information for this guide was last updated on: April 5, 2019

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. Online Conservation Guide for Gavia immer. Available from: Accessed May 20, 2019.

Back to top