Short-eared Owl

Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763)

Short-eared owl (Asio flammeus)
A.J. Hand

Aves (Birds)
Strigidae (Typical Owls)
State Protection
Listed as Endangered by New York State: in imminent danger of extirpation in New York. For animals, taking, importation, transportation, or possession is prohibited, except under license or permit. For plants, removal or damage without the consent of the landowner is prohibited.
Federal Protection
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
The Migratory Bird Treaty Act implements various treaties and conventions between the U. S. and Canada, Japan, Mexico and the former Soviet Union for the protection of migratory birds. Under this Act, taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds, including nests or eggs, is unlawful unless specifically permitted by other regulations.
State Conservation Status Rank
Imperiled in New York - Very vulnerable to disappearing from New York due to rarity or other factors; typically 6 to 20 populations or locations in New York, very few individuals, very restricted range, few remaining acres (or miles of stream), and/or steep declines.
Global Conservation Status Rank
Secure globally - Common in the world; widespread and abundant (but may be rare in some parts of its range).


Did you know?

The Short-eared Owl is unique within its family (Strigidae) in the way it builds a ground nest. The female makes a small scrape in the ground with her body and lines it with nearby material (NatureServe 2003).

State Ranking Justification

The Short-eared Owl population is declining in New York, as it is throughout much its range. The second Breeding Bird Atlas reported probable or confirmed breeding in 13 blocks (McGowan and Corwin 2008). In comparison, the first Breeding Bird Atlas (1980-1985) reported probable or confirmed breeding in 14 blocks (Andrle and Carroll 1988). The number of reported possible breeding blocks declined from 22 during the first Atlas to 11 during the second Atlas. It appears that Long Island has lost nearly all breeding locations for Short-eared Owls with one block reported during the second Atlas compared to nine during the first Atlas. Breeding may no longer occur in the lower Hudson Valley as well as a number of other historically known breeding sites in the state. Wintering Short-eared Owl populations are variable, depending on rodent populations and snow cover.

Short-term Trends

Currently, it appears that populations are continuing to decline, although it may be difficult to determine trends due to the lack of precise location data from historical records (Schneider 2003). During the first Breeding Bird Atlas (1980-1985), there were five confirmed breeding records, nine probable breeding records, and 22 possible breeding records (Andrle and Carroll 1988). Data from the second Breeding Bird Atlas seems to indicate a decline with four blocks with confirmed breeding, nine blocks with probable breeding, and 11 blocks with possible breeding (McGowan and Corwin 2008). This represents a 33% decline (Corwin 2012). During the first atlas, Short-eared Owls were recorded in nine blocks on Long Island, compared to one block during the second Atlas (Schneider 2008). Breeding may no longer occur in the lower Hudson Valley as well as a number of other historically known breeding sites in the state. Some records may be a single breeding event in an area with unusually high rodent populations. Overall, the distribution in New York is largely unchanged except for the reduction of reports on Long Island (Schneider 2008). Breeding Bird Survey data is too sparse in New York to determine trends. Wintering populations are variable depending on snow cover and rodent populations. It is difficult to determine winter population trends as few sites are surveyed on a regular basis.

Long-term Trends

During the early 20th century, Eaton (1914) reported Short-eared Owls as one of our most common owls outnumbering all other owls found in lowlands and marshes, especially in the winter. Approximately 60 years later, Bull (1974) described short-eared owl populations as declining with localized breeding reported.

Conservation and Management

Conservation Overview

The main management goal is to provide large, contiguous grassland habitat with varying microhabitats/age structures for both breeding and wintering seasons. Management plans should begin with identifying focus areas and the target grassland bird species (Morgan and Burger 2008). Winter raptor locations, especially those with Short-eared Owls, are considered a high priority. Land managers should also consider how late summer and fall management will impact wintering Short-eared Owls. Herkert et al. (1993) recommends restoration sites for the most fragmentation-sensitive grassland birds should be at least 125 acres, however, more than 250 acres would be best. Fragmentation should be eliminated when possible. Short-eared Owls typically breed in large fields with high vegetation density with approximately 20% forbs. Vegetation height preferences range from 40-60 cm (15.5-23.5 in) (Morgan and Burger 2008). Perch sites may be important for Short-eared Owls (Morgan and Burger 2008). Lambert et al (2009) suggests benefits of setting up regional boundaries instead of political boundaries include: consistent data collection in areas with similar habitat characteristics, increases the sample size to detect trends and spatial patterns by region, and allows for an increased number of scientists to collaborate. Management strategies should include working with private landowners and public land managers. Landowner Incentive Program funds to conserve privately-owned grasslands are likely crucial to successful grassland bird habitat restoration. Lazazzero (2006), suggests the goal of sustainable grassland bird populations in the St. Lawrence Plain cannot be met without this type of collaboration. There are three techniques to manage grassland habitat: mowing, burning, and grazing. Some undisturbed habitat should be available for grassland birds each season. One exception is severely degraded habitat which may benefit from restoration of the entire site in a single year, especially if target species are no longer present (Morgan and Burger 2008). The preliminary management steps should be to remove all hedgerows in the managed area, to reduce fragmentation and predator corridors, sometime between August 16 and November 1 (NYS DEC no date-a). Disturbances, such as mowing, planting, harvesting, and driving in fields should be avoided between April 23 to August 15 (NYS DEC no date-a, Morgan and Burger 2008). Wintering birds should not be disturbed by frequent snowmobile or other ATV use or loud noises (e.g., fireworks) (NYS DEC no date-a). Hiking areas should be restricted to the perimeter of the fields to reduce disturbances to breeding birds (Herkert et al. 1993). The recommended optimal mowing window is from Aug 16 to October 1 (NYS DEC no date-a). However, spot mowing may be needed before August 15 to control shrub and forb growth (Morgan and Burger 2008). Mower decks should be set high for spring mowing (before April 23) (Morgan and Burger 2008). Cool season grasses should grow rapidly after early mowing, giving the grasses a chance to compete with forbs. Late season mowing (after August 15) should occur early in the window if the goal is to control forbs, which should be cut prior to seed maturation (NYS DEC no date-a, Morgan and Burger 2008). The preferred mowing height is 8 inches, no less than 6 inches (NYS DEC no date-a). Three to four inches of thatch or 1/3 of the chopped vegetation should be left behind after mowing as it used by nesting birds and it provides cover for moles and voles that are prey for Short-eared Owls (NYS DEC no date-a, NYS DEC no date-b). Thatch also returns nutrients to the soil; however, excessive amounts of thatch may inhibit new grass growth (NYS DEC no date-b). Mowing should occur on a rotational schedule to provide grasslands with different age structures for various grassland bird species (NYS DEC no date-a). Fields 30 acres or larger, should be divided into thirds; smaller fields should be divided in half (NYS DEC no date-a). Grazing leaves behind little or no thatch but does provide nutrients for the soil (manure) and creates mixed height vegetation (Morgan and Burger 2008). Closely monitoring the grassland quality and species present is needed when grazing is used as a management technique because animals can be selective and leave behind undesirable vegetation (Morgan and Burger 2008). Burning is another technique that is used to manage grasslands, especially to encourage warm season grasses (Morgan and Burger 2008). Prescribed burns should occur on larger parcels and no more than 30% should be burned per year (Herkert et al. 1993). Burning should be scheduled in March or April or in October or November (Herkert et al. 1993). This management technique is typically the most expensive method as it requires personnel, training, and equipment (Morgan and Burger 2008). Invasive plant species can pose a significant threat to the quality of the grassland habitat. In addition, invasive species control is challenging (NYS DEC no date-b) and may require years to make an impact (Morgan and Burger 2008). Carefully timed mowing, grazing, and burning can be effective methods to eradicate invasive species. If nothing else works, herbicides may be a last resort.


The most significant threat to Short-eared Owls is habitat loss due to development, reforestation, wetland loss, and changes in farming practices such as conversion of hayfields to row crops or more frequent mowing of hayfields (Corwin 2012, Morgan and Burger 2008, Post 2004, Wiggins et al. 2020). Invasive species pose a threat to grassland habitat quality and increase the speed of succession (Morgan and Burger 2008). As a ground-nesting bird, eggs and unfledged young are at risk of depredation by mammalian predators such as foxes, raccoons, and skunks, especially in areas with fragmented habitat. There is also increased risk of depredation of unfledged young and prey by domestic and feral cats and dogs in areas with some development (Wiggins et al 2020). A limiting factor for Short-eared Owls is their dependency on microtine rodent populations. Poisoning may be a threat in areas where humans are attempting to control rodent populations. As with many raptors, Short-eared Owls have been subjected to shooting by humans.

Research Needs

Population monitoring standards need to be developed and implemented to better estimate the local population status (distribution, abundance, and trends) during the breeding and non-breeding seasons. Current methods, such as flushing sitting females or roadside counts, are either labor and time intensive or result in under-estimating population sizes. More could be learned about nocturnal movements, migration patterns, adult and juvenile mortality, and the relationship between rodent abundance and territory size. Studies are needed on the effects of habitat management (i.e. burning, mowing, and plowing) on grassland birds (Morgan and Burger 2008, Post 2004) as well as small mammal populations. Additional studies are needed on the how native vs non-native grasses affect the grassland bird diversity (Morgan and Burger 2008).



Open areas such as grasslands (hayfields, fallow farm lands, and pastures) and fresh and salt water marshes are typically used during the Short-eared Owl breeding season in New York. They tend to prefer habitats with some water which may be due to the habitat preference of voles, their primary prey. Day roosts are typically on the ground, but also may be under low shrubs, in conifers, or low open perches. During the winter months, Short-eared Owls use habitats similar to the those of the breeding season. They also can be found at old dumps where rodent populations may be high. They may move further south during winters with deep snow cover.

Associated Ecological Communities

  • Cropland/field crops
    An agricultural field planted in field crops such as alfalfa, wheat, timothy, and oats. This community includes hayfields that are rotated to pasture.
  • Dwarf shrub bog* (guide)
    A wetland usually fed by rainwater or mineral-poor groundwater and dominated by short, evergreen shrubs and peat mosses. The surface of the peatland is usually hummocky, with shrubs more common on the hummocks and peat moss throughout. The water in the bog is usually nutrient-poor and acidic.
  • High salt marsh (guide)
    A coastal marsh community that occurs in sheltered areas of the seacoast, in a zone extending from mean high tide up to the limit of spring tides. It is periodically flooded by spring tides and flood tides. High salt marshes typically consist of a mosaic of patches that are mostly dominated by a single graminoid species.
  • Low salt marsh (guide)
    A coastal marsh community that occurs in sheltered areas of the seacoast, in a zone extending from mean high tide down to mean sea level or to about 2 m (6 ft) below mean high tide. It is regularly flooded by semidiurnal tides. The mean tidal range of low salt marshes on Long Island is about 80 cm, and they often form in basins with a depth of 1.6 m or greater.
  • Pastureland
    Agricultural land permanently maintained (or recently abandoned) as a pasture area for livestock.
  • Salt panne* (guide)
    A shallow depression in a salt marsh where the marsh is poorly drained. Pannes occur in both low and high salt marshes. Pannes in low salt marshes usually lack vegetation, and the substrate is a soft, silty mud. Pannes in a high salt marsh are irregularly flooded by spring tides or flood tides, but the water does not drain into tidal creeks. After a panne has been flooded the standing water evaporates and the salinity of the soil water is raised well above the salinity of sea-water.
  • Successional blueberry heath*
    A shrubland dominated by ericaceous (heath-like) shrubs that occurs on sites with acidic soils that have been cleared (for logging, farming, etc.) or otherwise disturbed.
  • Successional fern meadow* (guide)
    A meadow dominated by ferns that occurs on sites that have been cleared (for logging, farming, etc.) or otherwise disturbed.
  • Successional northern sandplain grassland (guide)
    A meadow community that occurs on open sandplains that have been cleared and plowed (for farming or development), and then abandoned. This community is usually dominated by low, dry turf of sedges and grasses less than 30 cm (12 inches) tall, and include patches of open sand and patches of soil covered with mosses and lichens.
  • Successional old field
    A meadow dominated by forbs and grasses that occurs on sites that have been cleared and plowed (for farming or development), and then abandoned or only occasionally mowed.

* probable association but not confirmed.

Associated Species

  • Northern Harrier (Circus hudsonius) (guide)


New York State Distribution

New York is the southern edge of the Short-eared Owl breeding range with the exception of some scattered breeding records as far south as Virginia (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 2003). The breeding range in the state is generally limited to the St. Lawrence and Lake Champlain valleys, the Great Lakes Plains, and marshes along the south shore of Long Island. Between the fall and spring, the number of Short-eared Owl observations increases as northern populations migrate south, possibly in search of food. Significant numbers of wintering owls are in the Finger Lakes and the Lake Ontario plains, especially in Jefferson County, at scattered locations in the Hudson Valley, and the south shore of Long Island.

Global Distribution

Breeding: In North America, Short-eared Owls are found from northern Alaska to northern Labrador, south to California, Utah, Colorado, Missouri, Illinois, Ohio, and Virginia. They are more numerous in western and central North America than in eastern North America. Breeding has been recorded in small numbers in every province and territory in Canada (NatureServe 2003). Currently, in the northeastern United States, nesting is known in Vermont, New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania (Tate 1992). Breeding has also been documented in the Hawaiian Islands, Caroline Islands (Ponape), and Greater Antilles (Cuba, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico) (AOU 1983). In Eurasia, Short-eared Owls are found from Iceland, British Isles, Scandinavia, northern Russia, and northern Siberia south to southern Europe, Afghanistan, northern Mongolia, the northern Kurile Islands, and Kamchatka. Non-breeding: Outside of the breeding season, Short-eared Owls are more common from the southern parts of most of the Canadian provinces south to southern Baja California, southern Mexico, the Gulf Coast, and Florida. Short-eared Owls reside on all the main islands of Hawaii and can be found in the Greater Antilles, but are uncommon in Puerto Rico, including Isla Culebra. In the Old World, non-breeding birds are found from areas within the breeding range south to northwestern Africa, the Mediterranean region, Ceylon, southern China, and Japan (AOU 1983).

Best Places to See

  • Point Peninsula (Winter) (Jefferson County)
  • Fort Edward Grasslands (Winter) (Washington County)

Identification Comments

Identifying Characteristics

Short-eared Owls are a small to medium-sized owl. They are characterized by their barely visible ear tufts and a whitish facial disk with a dark area around bright yellow eyes. The back and upper wings are tawny brown to buff colored with some streaking. The ventral surface is much lighter with bold vertical streaking on the breast and a pale belly that is lightly streaked. Wings are long with a buffy patch beyond the wrist. They have a distinct black carpal bar. There is a dark patch at the base of the primaries. Legs and feet are feathered. Sexes are similar. Generally, females are darker than males; young birds are darker than older birds. Juveniles have a dark facial disk that lightens with age. They have full adult plumage by October of the first year. Short-eared Owl flight is described as "moth or bat-like". Wing beats are unhurried and irregular. They fly low over grasslands or mashes. Females make a simple nest by creating a small depression in the ground and lining it with grass, leaves, twigs, or feathers. Eggs are white, short, elliptical, smooth, and non-glossy. Short-eared Owls are generally silent, but do occassionally vocalize. Males will make a muffled "poo, poo, poo" sound. Both sexes have an alarm call that is described as nasal barks and wheezy notes ("cheef, cheef, cheef" and "cheewaay"). Young owls have a food-begging call ("pssssip"). Both adults and young will clack their bills when annoyed or in defense. In flight, Short-eared Owls will clap their wings making the sound similar to that of a cracking whip.


Short-eared Owls detect prey by coursing open areas while flying low to the ground. They may briefly hover over prey before taking it. At times, they hunt from a perch. Short-eared Owls were observed caching prey during the winter in Jefferson County (G.A. Smith, pers. comm. cited in NatureServe 2003). There are three displays most commonly observed during the breeding season: wing-clapping, exaggerated wing-beats, and skirmishing. These behaviors are usually performed in territorial defense or courtship. Skirmishes can be aggressive in nature. The male Short-eared Owl courtship display is in flight and involves vocalization, a spiraling flight, and wing-clapping (NatureServe 2003).


Microtine rodents are the preferred prey. However, Short-eared Owl prey also includes other small mammals and sometimes birds. Young may also take insects (NatureServe 2003).

Best Time to See

During the breeding season, the best time to observe Short-eared Owls is between March and April when courtship and territorial defense begin. There is an increased likelihood of observing birds during the fall and early winter while birds are migrating to their wintering grounds in the state. Short-eared Owls are found on their wintering grounds from early winter to late winter or early spring.

  • Active
  • Reproducing

The time of year you would expect to find Short-eared Owl active and reproducing in New York.

Similar Species

  • Northern Harrier (Circus hudsonius) (guide)
    Northern Harriers have an owl-like facial disk which may cause some confusion when initially trying to distinguish them from Short-eared Owls. Short-eared Owls lack the distinctive white rump patch of Northern Harriers.

Short-eared Owl Images


Short-eared Owl
Asio flammeus (Pontoppidan, 1763)

  • Kingdom Animalia
    • Phylum Craniata
      • Class Aves (Birds)
        • Order Strigiformes (Owls)
          • Family Strigidae (Typical Owls)

Additional Resources


Adair, P. 1982. The short-eared owl (Asio accipitrinus, Pallus) and the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus, L.) in the vole plague districts. Ann. Scot. Nat. Hist. 1982:219-231.

American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 p.

American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1989. Thirty-seventh supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Checklist of North American birds. Auk 106:532-538.

Andrle, Robert F. and Janet R. Carroll, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell University Press. 551 pp.

Banfield, A. W. F. 1947. A study of the winter feeding habits of the Short-eared Owl in the Toronto region. Canadian Journal of Research 25:45-65.

Bent, A. C. 1938. Life histories of North American birds of prey. Part 2. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 170. 482 pp., 92 pls.

Beske, A., and J. Champion. 1971. Prolific nesting of short-eared owls on Buena Vista Marsh. Passenger Pigeon 33:99-103.

Bosakowski, T. 1986. Short-eared owl winter roosting strategies. American Birds 40:237-240.

Bull, John. 1974. Birds of New York State. Doubleday, Garden City, New York. 655 pp.

Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.

Clark, R.J. 1975. A field study of the short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) Pontoppidan in North America. Wildlife Monographs 47:1-67.

Combs, K. P., and C. R. Griffin. 1990. Population dynamics, habitat use and management of short-eared owls on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Department of Forest and Wildlife Management, Amherst, Massachusetts. Unpublished progress report. 24 pp.

Corwin, Kimberley. 2012. Species Status Assessment: Short-eared Owl. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Craighead, J. J., and F. C. Craighead, Jr. 1956. Hawks, Owls and Wildlife. The Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C.

Cramp, S., editor. 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa. The birds of the western Palearctic. Vol. 4, terns to woodpeckers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

Dement'ev, G. P., N. A. Gladkov, and E. P. Spangenber. 1951. Birds of the Soviet Union. Israel Prog. for Sci. Translations, Russian translation, Jerusalem, Israel.

Dubois, A.D. 1924. A nuptial song flight of the short-eared owl. Auk 41:260-263.

Eaton, E.H. 1914. Birds of New York. Part II. New York: University of the State of New York.

Forbush, E. H. 1927. Birds of Massachusetts and other New England States. Part 2: Land birds from bob-whites to Grackles. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Boston, Massachusetts. 461 pp.

Goddard, T. R. 1935. A census of short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) at Newcastle, Roxburgshire. Journal of Animal Ecology 4:113-118.

Herkert, J.R., R.E. Szafoni, V.M. Kleen, and J.E. Schwegman. 1993. Habitat establishment, enhancement and management for forest and grassland birds in Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage, Natural Heritage Technical Publication 1, Springfield, IL. 20 pp.

Holt, D. 1985. The short-eared owl in Massachusets. Cape Nat. 14:31-35.

Holt, D. W., and S. M. Melvin. 1986. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts: summary of 1985 research. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildife, Natural Heritage Program, Boston, Massachusetts.

Johnsgard, P. 1988. North American owls: biology and natural history. Smithsonian Inst. Press. 336 pp.

Lambert, J. D., T. P. Hodgman, E. J. Laurent, G. L. Brewer, M. J. Iliff, and R. Dettmers. 2009. The Northeast Bird Monitoring Handbook. American Bird Conservancy. The Plains, Virginia. 32 pp. (Accessed on June 15, 2020 at

Larsen, J.C. 1987. Short-eared owl breeding survey. California Department of Fish and Game, Nongame Wildlife Investigation. Unpublished report. Project No. W-065-R-4, Job No. II-13.

Lazazzero, Sarah A. 2006. A Multi-Scale Analysis of Grassland Bird Habitat Relationships in the St. Lawrence River Valley.
Environmental Science and Ecology Theses. 9.

Levine, E. 1998. Bull's birds of New York State. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, NY.

Lockie, J.D. 1955. The breeding habits and food of short-eared owls after a vole plague. Bird Study 2:53-69.

McGowan, K.J. and K. Corwin, eds. 2008. The Second Atlas of Breeding Birds in New York State: 2000-2005. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. 688 pp.

Melvin, S.M., D.G. Smith, D.W. Holt, and G.R. Tate. 1989. Small owls. Pages 88-96 in B.G. Pendleton, editor. Proceedings of the Northeast raptor management symposium and workshop. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C. 353 pp.

Mikkola, H. 1983. Owls of Europe. Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota. 400 pp.

Morgan, Michael and M. Burger. 2008. A plan for conserving grassland birds in New York: final report for the Department of Environmental Conservation under contract #C005137. Audubon New York. Ithaca, NY.

Murray, G. A. 1976. Geographic variation in the clutch sizes of seven owl species. Auk 93:602-613.

National Geographic Society (NGS). 1983. Field guide to the birds of North America. National Geographic Society, Washington, DC.

NatureServe. 2003. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 1.8. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available (Accessed: January 26, 2004).

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

New York State Breeding Bird Atlas 2000. 2004. Report on confirmed or probable breeding short-eared owls in New York by county.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). No date-a. Best Management Practices for Grassland Birds. (Accessed on June 18, 2020)

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC). no date-b. Grassland Bird Habitat and Ecology. (Accessed on June 18, 2020).

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Endangered Species Unit (NYS DEC). 2003. Short-eared owl fact sheet. Last updated March 21, 2003. Available at http://www/ (Accessed on March 5, 2004).

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1986. New York State Breeding Bird Atlas Database. Wildlife Resources Center. Delmar, NY.

Peterson, R.T. 1934. A field guide to the birds. First edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Pitelka, F. A., P. Q. Tomich, and G. W. Treichel. 1955. Breeding Behavior of jaegers and owls near Barrow, Alaska. Condor 57:3-18. Ecological Monographs 25(1):85-117.

Post, Tim. 2004. State wildlife comprehensive plan- draft species group report for grassland birds. In: New York State Department of Environmental Coservation. Comprehensive wildlife conservation strategy species reports for: Birds. 114 pgs. September 24, 2004.

Root, T. 1988. Atlas of Wintering North American Birds: An Analysis of Christmas Bird Count Data. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 312 pp.

Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2007. The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966-2006. Version 10.13.2007. US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD.

Schneider, K. J. 2008. Short-eared owl (Asio flammeus). Pages 300-01 in The second atlas of breeding birds in New York State (K.J. McGowan and K. Corwin, eds.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Schneider, Kathryn J. 2003. The status and ecology of the short-eared owl (Asio flammeus) in New York State. Kingbird. 53(4):313-330.

Smith, G. A. 1989. Point Peninsula, Jefferson County; mouse raptor mecca during the winter of 1987-1988. Kingbird 39(1):7-20.

Snyder, L.L., and C.E. Hope. 1938. A predator-prey relationship between the short-eared owl and the meadow mouse. Wilson Bulletin 50:110-112.

Tate, G. R. 1992. Short-eared owl, Asio flammeus. Pages 171-189 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.

Tate, G. R., and S. M. Melvin. 1987. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts: summary of 1986 research. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. Unpublished report.

Tate, G.R. 1991. Population dynamics, reproductive ecology, and conservation of two insular populations of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts. M.S. thesis. 107 pp.

Tate, G.R. 1992. Short-eared owl, Asio flammeus. pgs. 171-189 in K.J. Shcneider and D.M. Pence, eds. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400pp.

Tate, G.R., and S.M. Melvin. 1988. Population dynamics, habitat use, and management needs of the short-eared owl in Massachusetts. Massachusetts Division of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Boston, Massachusetts. Unpublished progress report. 15 pp.

Tate, J., Jr. 1986. The Blue List for 1986. American Birds 40:227-236.

Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Urner, C. A. 1925. Notes on two ground-nesting birds of prey. Auk 42:31-41.

Urner, C.A. 1923. Notes on the short-eared owl. Auk 40:30-36.

Village, A. 1987. Numbers, territory-size and turnover of short-eared owls Asio flammeus in relation to vole abundance. Ornis Scandinavica 18:198-204.

Wiggins, D. A., D. W. Holt, and S. M. Leasure (2020). Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (S. M. Billerman, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. (Accessed on June 15, 2020)

Young, L. S., J. G. Grenshaw, and L. L. Grenshaw. 1988. Food caching by a short-eared owl. Murrelet 69:39.


About This Guide

This guide was authored by: Shaw, Hollie Y.

Information for this guide was last updated on: June 29, 2020

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. Online Conservation Guide for Asio flammeus. Available from: Accessed July 18, 2024.