Did you know you can canoe through one of the largest tidal swamps in the state? Accessible from Ramshorn Creek, you can canoe to Ramshorn-Livingston Sanctuary, a preserve that includes a 400-acre tidal swamp. The sanctuary is owned and managed the National Audubon Society and Scenic Hudson. Educational programs, including field trips for school groups and birding trips are offered. Bald eagles, waterfowl, woodcocks, and other birds and wildlife have been spotted on the property. To visit the preserve, go to http://ny.audubon.org/ramshorn.htm
An uncommon natural community occurring in a very restricted area in the state. Additionally, this community occurs at the juncture between the Hudson River and land, an area that is commonly developed. Many sites were likely lost historically as a result.
While most of the original tidal swamps were lost through historical shoreline development, the swamps remaining are likely stable and total acreage is probably no longer decreasing.
The number of freshwater tidal marshes in New York probably declined moderately from historical numbers as a result of shoreline development (e.g., railroads) and river channel dredging.
The main direct threats to this community are construction or filling, in or near the swamps, especially if the activity alters the natural tidal regime. Even in protected lands, road building and other activities may threaten this community in these ways. River pollution is a threat to the organisms in this community and in the adjacent wetlands. Invasive species, such as yellow iris (Iris pseudacorus), are a threat to a few examples.
This community requires natural tidal flooding; any activity in the vicinity of freshwater tidal swamp must ensure the maintainence of tidal flooding. Also, consider removing any existing blockages to flooding and existing channels that might accelerate drainage.
Buffers that diminish or eliminate disturbances in this estuarine community are critical considerations for any development project. Such disturbances include the influx of water-borne solutes (road salt, fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, sewage), water-borne sediments, and noise pollution. Additionally, hydrologic connectivity to the river must be maintained so that unimpeded tidal flow can reach the swamp. When considering road construction and other development activities minimize actions that will change what water carries and how water travels to this community, both on the surface and underground. Water traveling over-the-ground as run-off usually carries an abundance of silt, clay, and other particulates during (and often after) a construction project. While still suspended in the water, these particulates make it difficult for aquatic animals to find food; after settling to the bottom of the wetland, these particulates bury small plants and animals and alter the natural functions of the community in many other ways. Thus, road construction and development activities near this community type should strive to minimize particulate-laden run-off into this community. Water traveling on the ground or seeping through the ground also carries dissolved minerals and chemicals. Road salt, for example, is becoming an increasing problem both to natural communities and as a contaminant in household wells. Fertilizers, detergents, and other chemicals that increase the nutrient levels in wetlands cause algae blooms and eventually an oxygen-depleted environment where few animals can live. Herbicides and pesticides often travel far from where they are applied and have lasting effects on the quality of the natural community. So, road construction and other development activities should strive to consider: 1. how water moves through the ground, 2. the types of dissolved substances these development activities may release, and 3. how to minimize the potential for these dissolved substances to reach this natural community.
Additional sites might still be found along the Hudson River, although it is likely they will be small and disturbed.
Research is needed to clearly separate this community from floodplain forest on the ground. It is possible that a few present-day floodplain forests along the Hudson River were formerly freshwater tidal swamps prior to dredge spoil deposition or other hydrological alterations.
This community is currently restricted to the central Hudson Valley portion of the Hudson River within Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, and Ulster Counties.
This freshwater tidal swamp community is restricted to the freshwater tidal portions of rivers in Massachusetts, New York, and New Jersey.
A forested or shrub-dominated tidal wetland that occurs in lowlands along large river systems characterized by gentle slope gradients coupled with tidal influence over considerable distances. The swamp substrate is always wet and is subject to regular flooding by fresh tidal water. The water salinity values are less than 0.5 parts per thousand (ppt).
This community has a relatively high abundance of woody plants in contrast to the non-woody plants found in tidal marshes, and is influenced by the daily rise and fall of a freshwater tidal river or bay.
Different viewing opportunities present themselves throughout the growing season. In early spring, skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) flowers may be visible pushing through the snow, and soon after spice bush (Lindera benzoin) blooms with tiny yellow flowers. In late summer (late August through September), herbaceous plants are at their largest and are a treat to see.
This New York natural community encompasses all or part of the concept of the following International Vegetation Classification (IVC) natural community associations. These are often described at finer resolution than New York's natural communities. The IVC is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
This New York natural community falls into the following ecological system(s). Ecological systems are often described at a coarser resolution than New York's natural communities and tend to represent clusters of associations found in similar environments. The ecological systems project is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
Fraxinus nigra (black ash)
Fraxinus pennsylvanica (green ash)
Ulmus rubra (slippery elm)
Alnus incana ssp. rugosa (speckled alder)
Alnus serrulata (smooth alder)
Cornus racemosa (gray dogwood, red-panicled dogwood)
Cornus sericea (red-osier dogwood)
Lindera benzoin (spicebush)
Viburnum dentatum var. lucidum (smooth arrowwood)
Parthenocissus quinquefolia (Virginia-creeper)
Amphicarpaea bracteata (hog peanut)
Bidens discoidea (few-bracted beggar-ticks)
Bidens laevis (smooth beggar-ticks)
Boehmeria cylindrica (false nettle)
Carex grayi (Gray's sedge)
Cinna arundinacea (stout wood-reed)
Impatiens capensis (spotted jewelweed, spotted touch-me-not)
Iris pseudacorus (yellow iris)
Laportea canadensis (wood-nettle)
Leersia oryzoides (rice cut grass)
Lobelia cardinalis (cardinal flower)
Lysimachia nummularia (moneywort, creeping-Jenny)
Mimulus ringens (Allegheny monkey-flower)
Onoclea sensibilis (sensitive fern)
Peltandra virginica (green arrow-arum, tuckahoe)
Persicaria arifolia (halberd-leaved tear-thumb)
Persicaria hydropiper (water-pepper)
Persicaria hydropiperoides (mild water-pepper)
Ranunculus hispidus (woodland butter-cup, woodland crow-foot)
Rumex verticillatus (swamp dock)
Symphyotrichum lateriflorum (calico-aster)
Symplocarpus foetidus (skunk-cabbage)
This figure helps visualize the structure and "look" or "feel" of a typical Freshwater Tidal Swamp. Each bar represents the amount of "coverage" for all the species growing at that height. Because layers overlap (shrubs may grow under trees, for example), the shaded regions can add up to more than 100%.
Breden, T.F. 1988. A tidal swamp forest in New Jersey. Bartonia 54: 146.
DeVries, C. and C.B. DeWitt. 1986. Freshwater tidal wetlands community description and relation of plant distribution to elevation and substrate. In: Polgar Fellowship Reports of the Hudson River National Estuarine Sanctuary Program 1986. E.A. Blair and J.C. Cooper, editors. Hudson River Foundation, New York, New York.
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/ecocomm2014.pdf
Edinger, Gregory J., D.J. Evans, Shane Gebauer, Timothy G. Howard, David M. Hunt, and Adele M. Olivero (editors). 2002. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY. 136 pp.
Findlay, S.E.G., E. Kiviat, W.C. Nieder, and E.A. Blair. 2002. Functional assessment of a reference wetland set as a tool for science, management and restoration. Aquat. Sci. 64:107-117.
Kiviat, E. 1974. A fresh-water tidal marsh on the Hudson, Tivoli North Bay. Paper 14, In Third Symposium on Hudson River Ecology, Hudson River Environmental Society, Bronx, New York.
Kiviat, E. 1979. Hudson River Estuary shore zone: ecology and management. MA Thesis, State University College, New Paltz, New York.
Kiviat, E. 1983. Fresh-tidal swamp vegetation, Hudson River. Estuaries 6(3):279.
Kiviat, Erik and Gretchen Stevens. 2001. Biodiversity assessment manual for the Hudson River Estuary Corridor. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY.
Leonardi, L. 1991. Bryophytes of two New York State freshwater tidal swamps. Evansia 8(1):22-25.
Leonardi, L. and E. Kiviat. 1990. The bryophytes of the Tivoli Bays freshwater tidal swamps. Section III: 23 pp. In J.R. Waldman and E.A. Blair (eds.). Polgar Fellowship Reports of the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Program, 1989. Hudson River Foundation, New York.
McVaugh, R. 1958. Flora of the Columbia County area, New York. Bull. 360. New York State Museum and Science Service. University of the State of New York. Albany, NY. 400 pp.
Muenscher, W.C. 1937. VII. Aquatic vegetation of the Lower Hudson area. 1936. Biological Survey. 11:231-248.
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2020. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.
Noss, R.F., E.T.I. LaRoe, and J.M. Scott. 2001. Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation. United States Geological Survey, Biological Resources. 74 pp. Available at http://biology.usgs.gov/pubs/ecosys.htm.
Reschke, Carol. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Latham, NY. 96 pp. plus xi.
Rheinhardt, R. 1992. A multivariate analysis of vegetation patterns in tidal freshwater swamps of lower Chesapeake Bay, USA. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119:192-207.
Westad, Kristen E. 1987. Addendum to flora of freshwater tidal swamps at Tivoli Bays. Section X: 1 p. In E.A. Blair (eds.), Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Reports of the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve Program, 1986. Hudson River Foundation, New York.
Westad, Kristen E. and E. Kiviat. 1986. Flora of freshwater tidal swamps at Tivoli Bays, Hudson River National Estuarine Sanctuary. Unpublished report of Bard College Ecology Field Station.
This guide was authored by: Timothy G. Howard
Information for this guide was last updated on: March 6, 2017
Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2020. Online Conservation Guide for Freshwater tidal swamp. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/freshwater-tidal-swamp/. Accessed January 27, 2020.