Saltwater tidal creek at Jamaica Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Gateway National Recreation Area Gregory J. Edinger

Saltwater tidal creek at Jamaica Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Gateway National Recreation Area
Gregory J. Edinger

System
Estuarine
Subsystem
Estuarine Subtidal
State Protection
Not Listed
Not listed or protected by New York State.
Federal Protection
Not Listed
State Conservation Status Rank
S3
Vulnerable in New York - Vulnerable to disappearing from New York due to rarity or other factors (but not currently imperiled); typically 21 to 80 populations or locations in New York, few individuals, restricted range, few remaining acres (or miles of stream), and/or recent and widespread declines.
Global Conservation Status Rank
G4
Apparently Secure globally - Uncommon in the world but not rare; usually widespread, but may be rare in some parts of its range; possibly some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.

Summary

Did you know?

Changes in salinity and temperature can influence migration patterns of fish within tidal creeks. Different species of fish are specialized for different levels of salinity. Fish that typically live in high salinity areas migrate into saltwater tidal creeks with high tide, following the increasing salinity level. Fish that spend most their time in the lower salinity areas of brackish or freshwater tidal creeks migrate farther upstream when the tides come in to avoid a sudden increase in salinity level. Some species of fish are able to tolerate low, mid, and high salinity areas. Some factors beyond salinity influencing the distribution of fish in tidal creeks include availability of food and presence of predators.

State Ranking Justification

There are estimated to be about 60 occurrences statewide. The several documented occurrences have good viability and are protected on public or private conservation land. The community is restricted to salt marsh complexes along the seacoast in the Coastal Lowlands ecozone and along Long Island Sound in the Manhattan Hills ecozone. The current trend of the community is thought to be declining. The primary threats to the community are shoreline development, marsh ditching, channel dredging and filling, declining water quality, diking and impoundment, changes to tidal hydrodynamics, and invasive species.

Short-term Trends

Over the last several decades, there have been significant decreases in the area of extent, number, and ecological integrity of low salt marshes in New York. Saltwater tidal creeks, which drain these marshes, may have suffered equally drastic declines, particularly from direct dredging and filling for urban development. It is possible that the number and acreage of this community may have increased in recent decades as mosquito ditches were cut into low salt marshes. Even if this is true, the morphology, health, and functionality of these systems has declined substantially with ditching (which changed sinuous drainages into an angular grid), declining water quality, and changes in tidal hydrodynamics.

Long-term Trends

The number, aerial extent, and integrity of salt marshes and associated saltwater tidal creeks in New York are suspected to have declined substantially from their historical state. These declines are likely correlated with coastal development; dredging, ditching, and filling; and changes in hydrology, water quality, and natural processes.

Conservation and Management

Threats

Saltwater tidal creeks are threatened by direct dredging and filling for development; by adjacent development, shoreline hardening, and associated run-off (including residential, municipal, road, and bridge construction); alteration to natural tidal hydrodynamics from impoundments, ditching, blocked culverts and outlets, stream channelization, water diversions, and bank stabilization; and by declining water quality (from sewage and stormwater discharge, nonpoint source runoff, landfill leachate, boat traffic, particulate aircraft and vehicular emissions, jet fuel, ethylene glycol from aircraft deicing, siltation, trash, turbidity, and pesticides). They are indirectly threatened by management activities in adjacent salt marsh complexes (e.g., pesticide use for mosquito control, marsh ditching, channel dredging, dredge spoil deposition). They may also be threatened by over-harvesting of commercial and game species. Some creeks are threatened by invasive, non-native plants, such as the algae dead man's fingers (Codium fragile), and animals, such as green crabs and mute swans.

Conservation Strategies and Management Practices

Where practical, establish and maintain a salt marsh and tidal creek buffer to reduce storm-water, pollution, and nutrient run-off, while simultaneously capturing sediments before they reach the creek. Buffer width should take into account the erodibility of the surrounding soils, slope steepness, and current land use. If possible, minimize the number and size of impervious surfaces in the surrounding landscape. Avoid habitat alteration within the creek and surrounding landscape. For example, roads should not be routed through the salt marsh and tidal creek buffer area. If the creek must be crossed, then bridges are preferred over filling and culverts. Restore past impacts, such as removing obsolete impoundments and ditches in order to restore natural tidal hydrodynamics. Prevent the spread of invasive exotic species into the creek through appropriate direct management and by minimizing potential dispersal corridors. Restoration and monitoring protocols for salt marsh complexes are available (Niedowski 2000).

Development and Mitigation Considerations

Strive to minimize or eliminate hardened shorelines and maintain low-sloped shorelines within the tidal zone to increase overland sediment input. Maintain functional connectivity between the open ocean and bays with salt marsh complexes to enable full tidal flushing during each tidal cycle. For example, barriers such as railway causeways should have numerous culverts to allow sufficient hydrologic connectivity. If flow restriction devices are needed, those that are calibrated for local tidal hydrology can be used. Avoid dumping dredge spoil onto salt marshes and associated tidal creeks. This community is best protected as part of a large salt marsh complex. Protected areas should encompass the full mosaic of low salt marsh, high salt marsh, marine intertidal mudflats, saltwater tidal creek, salt panne, and salt shrub communities to allow dynamic ecological processes (sedimentation, erosion, tidal flushing, and nutrient cycling) to continue. Connectivity to brackish and freshwater tidal communities, upland beaches and dunes, and to shallow offshore communities should be maintained. Connectivity between these habitats is important not only for nutrient flow and seed dispersal, but also for animals that move between them seasonally. Development of site conservation plans that identify wetland threats and their sources and provide management and protection recommendations would ensure their long-term viability.

Inventory Needs

Inventory needs are to continue to search for large saltwater tidal creeks in good condition (A- to AB-ranked), prioritizing creeks that are associated within high quality salt marsh complexes (e.g., high salt marsh, low salt marsh, salt pannes, and salt shrub).

Research Needs

Sufficient quantitative data on the characteristic flora and fauna of saltwater tidal creeks needs to be collected and the effects of invasive exotic plants and animals on the community needs to be investigated.

Rare Species

  • Acipenser brevirostrum (Shortnose Sturgeon) (guide)
  • Bartonia paniculata ssp. paniculata (Screw-stem) (guide)
  • Cardamine longii (Long's Bittercress) (guide)
  • Cyperus polystachyos var. texensis (Coast Flatsedge) (guide)
  • Eriocaulon parkeri (Estuary Hatpins)
  • Kinosternon subrubrum (Eastern Mud Turtle) (guide)
  • Rumex fueginus (Golden Dock) (guide)
  • Sabatia campanulata (Slender Marsh Pink) (guide)
  • Strongylura marina (Atlantic Needlefish) (guide)

Range

New York State Distribution

Restricted to salt marsh complexes in sheltered areas of the seacoast in the Coastal Lowlands ecozone and along the Long Island Sound in the Manhattan Hills ecozone in Bronx, Westchester, Kings, Queens, Nassau, and Suffolk counties.

Global Distribution

This community is assumed to occur along the Atlantic coastline from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick south to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina.

Best Places to See

  • Gateway National Recreation Area (Queens County)
  • Mashomack Preserve (Suffolk County)

Identification Comments

General Description

The aquatic community of a shallow, continuously semidiurnally tidally flooded creek with submerged areas averaging less than 2 m (6 ft) deep at low tide. The water is typically saline (18 to 30 ppt or greater) to brackish (0.5 to 18 ppt). Varying depth zones and flow microhabitats often result in a diverse array of ecological associations. Water levels fluctuate with the tides and two community depth zones are typically encountered: 1) the subtidal, permanently flooded, portion of the creek and 2) the intertidal portion including banks and midchannel bars or terraces exposed at low tide. Typical flow microhabitats in a fully-developed creek include abundant slow-flowing pools connected by runs with localized turbulent, fast-flowing riffles. Typical examples drain the waters of semidiurnally tidally flooded coastal salt marshes of the back barrier or finger marsh type. Most tidal creeks flow in a very sinuous pattern through a salt marsh. Although the vertical banks of the creek regularly erode and slump into the creek bottom, the position of the creek bed in the marsh is fairly stable and oxbows are rare. The sinuous meanders of the creek are not formed by recent erosion of the marsh, rather they are thought to be relict drainage channels that were active in tidal flats when salt marsh grasses first became established. Tidal creek pools have silty substrate with abundant beds of widgeon grass and tubed weed and the characteristic fauna hairy sea cucumber, American eel, grass shrimp, and eastern mud snail. Runs have sandy to gravelly substrate supporting marine algae species including tubed weed, graceful red weed, green fleece (Codium fragile), and a common exotic marine green algae; benthic marine fish such as naked goby (Gobiosoma bosci) and northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus); and many marine mollusks. Riffles have gravelly to cobbly bottoms with macroalgae beds of hollow green weed (Enteromorpha spp.), benthic marine fish such as naked goby, and marine mollusks such as common Atlantic slippershell. Intertidal peaty banks of creeks in salt marshes, especially in pools and runs, are characterized by abundant ribbed mussel (Modiolus demissus), mummichog, and killifish.

Characters Most Useful for Identification

Widgeon-grass (Ruppia maritima) is abundant in brackish to saline tidal creeks. Common epiphytic plants include the marine red algae tubed weed (Polysiphonia stricta) and banded weed (Ceramium strictum). Other characteristic plants are the marine red algae tubed weed (Polysiphonia denudata), graceful red weed (Gracilaria tikvahiae), and Spyridia filamentosa and several cyanobacteria including Hydrocoleum lyngbaceum, Anabaena torulosa, and Agmenellum quadruplicatum. Fauna in tidal creeks is diverse. Several fishes that are resident in brackish to saline tidal creeks at low tide also use the adjacent low salt marsh when it is flooded by high tide. Characteristic fishes that have this distribution pattern include Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia), mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus), striped killifish (Fundulus majalis), sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus), fourspine stickleback (Apeltes quadracus), threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), and American eel (Anguilla rostrata). Brackish to saline tidal creeks are also utilized as nursery areas for several important marine fishes, including winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus), black sea bass (Centropristis striata), bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix), and striped bass (Morone saxatilis). Great blue heron (Ardea herodias) and egrets commonly feed on the fish. Comb jellies (Beroe spp., Mnemiopsis spp.) are common plankton species. Common benthic epifauna include eastern mud snail (Nassarius obsoletus), daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), longwrist hermit crab (Pagurus longicarpus), and common Atlantic slippershell (Crepidula crepidula). Common benthic infauna include northern quahog (Mercenaria mercenaria), softshell clam (Mya arenaria), razor clam (Ensis directus), and bamboo worms (Polychaeta). Other characteristic marine invertebrates include blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), hairy sea cucumber (Sclerodactyla briareus), Atlantic horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus), acorn worm (Hemichordata) and terrebelid worm (Amphitrite spp.).

Elevation Range

Known examples of this community have been found at elevations between -4 feet and 6 feet.

Best Time to See

Saltwater tidal creeks can be accessed during high tide with a canoe; vegetation of the surrounding low salt marsh is best observed during midsummer.

Saltwater Tidal Creek Images

Classification

Characteristic Species

Nonvascular plants

Ulva lactuca

Emergent aquatics

Ruppia maritima (widgeon-grass, ditch-grass)

Spartina alterniflora (smooth cord grass)

Similar Ecological Communities

  • Freshwater tidal creek (guide)
    Freshwater tidal creeks, like saltwater tidal creeks, are influenced by diurnal tides, but their water salinity is extremely low, from 0 to 0.5 ppt.
  • Low salt marsh (guide)
    Low salt marshes, like tidal creeks, are influenced by diurnal tides, but salt marshes are not flowing channels, and have diverse and often dense vegetation cover dominated by cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora). Saltwater tidal creeks meander through low salt marshes.
  • Tidal river (guide)
    Tidal river and saltwater tidal creek can be differentiated based on depth. Tidal rivers contain a deepwater zone with water depths of greater than 2 m (6 ft) at low tide; saltwater tidal creeks are less than 2 m (6 ft) deep at low tide.

Vegetation

Nonvascular plants
10%
Emergent aquatics
4%

Percent cover

This figure helps visualize the structure and "look" or "feel" of a typical Saltwater Tidal Creek. Each bar represents the amount of "coverage" for all the species growing at that height. Because layers overlap (shrubs may grow under trees, for example), the shaded regions can add up to more than 100%.

Additional Resources

References

Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/ecocomm2014.pdf

Edinger, Gregory J., D.J. Evans, Shane Gebauer, Timothy G. Howard, David M. Hunt, and Adele M. Olivero (editors). 2002. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY. 136 pp.

Kiviat, Erik and Gretchen Stevens. 2001. Biodiversity assessment manual for the Hudson River Estuary Corridor. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY.

MacDonald, Dana and Gregory Edinger. 2000. Identification of reference wetlands on Long Island, New York. Final report prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Grant CD992436-01. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Latham, NY. 106 pp. plus appendices.

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

Niedowski, N.L. 2000. New York State salt marsh restoration and monitoring guidelines. Prepared for New York Department of State, Albany, NY, and New York Department of Environmental Conservation, East Setauket, NY.

Packham, J.R. and A.J. Willis. 1997. Ecology of Dunes, Salt Marsh and Shingle. Chapman and Hall, London.

Redfield, A. C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs 42:201-37.

Teal, J.M. 1986. The ecology of regularly flooded salt marshes of New England: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biol. Rep. 85(7.4). 61 pp.

Webber, E.E. 1967. Bluegreen algae from a Massachusetts salt marsh. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 94:99-106.

Links

About This Guide

This guide was authored by: Aissa Feldmann

Information for this guide was last updated on: March 27, 2017

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. Online Conservation Guide for Saltwater tidal creek. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/saltwater-tidal-creek/. Accessed May 26, 2019.

Back to top