Coastal oak-beech forest on Fisher's Island Gregory J. Edinger

Coastal oak-beech forest on Fisher's Island
Gregory J. Edinger

System
Terrestrial
Subsystem
Forested Uplands
State Protection
Not Listed
Not listed or protected by New York State.
Federal Protection
Not Listed
State Conservation Status Rank
S3
Vulnerable in New York - Vulnerable to disappearing from New York due to rarity or other factors (but not currently imperiled); typically 21 to 80 populations or locations in New York, few individuals, restricted range, few remaining acres (or miles of stream), and/or recent and widespread declines.
Global Conservation Status Rank
G4
Apparently Secure globally - Uncommon in the world but not rare; usually widespread, but may be rare in some parts of its range; possibly some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.

Summary

Did you know?

Beech-drops (Epifagus virginiana) is a characteristic species of coastal oak-beech forests. This parasitic plant is nearly white from lack of chlorophyll and grows only on the roots of beech trees. Instead of leaves, beech-drops have inconspicuous, ovate yellowish-purple scales. Beech-drops bloom from August to October, producing two-lipped flowers with purplish markings.

State Ranking Justification

There are an estimated 25 to 100 extant occurrences statewide. The several documented occurrences have good viability and most are protected on private or public conservation land. The community is restricted to interior portions of the coastal lowlands in Suffolk and Richmond Counties and is concentrated on the north-facing slopes of moraines. The acreage, extent, and condition of coastal oak-beech forests in New York are suspected to be declining. They are vulnerable to fragmentation and extirpation by continued residential development, including golf course creation and expansion. Beech bark disease is another increasingly pervasive threat.

Short-term Trends

The acreage, extent, and condition of coastal oak-beech forests in New York are suspected to be declining, primarily due to fragmentation and extirpation from residential development, beech bark disease, heavy deer browse, and exotic species invasion.

Long-term Trends

The number, extent, and viability of coastal oak-beech forests in New York are suspected to have declined substantially over the long-term. These declines are likely correlated with coastal development and associated changes in landscape connectivity.

Conservation and Management

Threats

Coastal oak-beech forests are vulnerable to fragmentation and extirpation by continued residential development, including golf course creation and expansion. The community is also threatened by beech bark disease, which causes significant mortality and defect in American beech (Fagus grandifolia). The disease results when bark, attacked and altered by the beech scale (Cryptococcus fagisuga), is invaded and killed by fungi, primarily Nectria coccinea var. faginata and sometimes N. galligena (Houston and O'Brien 1983). Heavy deer browse and exotic species invasion are additional threats.

Conservation Strategies and Management Practices

To promote a dynamic forest mosaic, allow natural processes, including gap formation from blowdowns and tree mortality as well as in-place decomposition of fallen coarse woody debris and standing snags, to operate, particularly in mature and old growth examples (Spies and Turner 1999). Management efforts should focus on the control or local eradication of invasive exotic plants and the reduction of white-tailed deer densities. Consider deer exclosures or population management, particularly if studies confirm that canopy species recruitment is being affected by heavy browse. Generally, management should focus on activities that help maintain regeneration of the species associated with this community. Deer have been shown to have negative effects on forest understories (Miller et al. 1992, Augustine and French 1998, Knight 2003) and management efforts should strive to ensure that tree and shrub seedlings are not so heavily browsed that they cannot replace overstory trees. If active forestry must occur, use silvicultural techniques and extended rotation intervals that promote regeneration of a diversity of canopy, subcanopy, and shrub species over time (Busby et al. 2009) while avoiding or minimizing both short-term and persistent residual disturbances such as soil compaction, loss of canopy cover due to logging road construction, and the unintended introduction of invasive exotic plants.

Development and Mitigation Considerations

Fragmentation of coastal forests should be avoided. It is also important to maintain connectivity with adjacent natural communities not only to allow nutrient flow and seed dispersal, but to allow animals to move between them seasonally. Strive to minimize fragmentation of large forest blocks by focusing development on forest edges, minimizing the width of roads and road corridors extending into forests, and designing cluster developments that minimize the spatial extent of the development. Development projects with the least impact on large forests and all the plants and animals living within these forests are those built on brownfields or other previously developed land. These projects have the added benefit of matching sustainable development practices (for example, see: The President's Council on Sustainable Development 1999 final report, US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification process at http://www.usgbc.org/). A cross-section of coastal oak-beech forest occurrences should be protected, including the largest ones, the most mature ones, and the ones in the best landscape block. More protection of the occurrences at Friars Head and Willdwood State Park is needed.

Inventory Needs

Surveys for additional large examples in Suffolk County are needed. Leads include Gardiners Island, Lloyd Neck, Jaynes Hill, and Wading River Marsh.

Research Needs

A critical assessment of the long-term effects of heavy deer browse on this community, particularly addressing oak and other canopy species seedling recruitment, is needed.

Rare Species

  • Andersonglossum virginianum (Wild Comfrey) (guide)
  • Carex nigromarginata (Black-edge Sedge) (guide)
  • Crataegus uniflora (Dwarf Hawthorn) (guide)
  • Gentiana saponaria (Soapwort Gentian) (guide)
  • Hypericum stragulum (Low St. John's Wort) (guide)
  • Lasiurus borealis (Eastern Red Bat) (guide)
  • Myotis septentrionalis (Northern Long-eared Bat) (guide)
  • Pinus virginiana (Virginia Pine) (guide)

Range

New York State Distribution

Restricted to interior portions of the coastal lowlands in Suffolk and Richmond Counties; concentrated on the north-facing slopes of moraines. Known examples range from Montauk Point (Brodo 1968) west to Big Woods along the south shore of Long Island and from Route 48 Southold to Camp Baiting Hollow along the north shore of Long Island. Numerous examples occur in the Riverhead portion of the north shore. The community is also reported from the necks of Long Island Sound (Greller 1977). It may occur in small patches farther west on Long Island to western Suffolk, Nassau and eastern Queens counties (Greller 1977). The community was also historically reported from New York City area by Harper (1917, in Brodo 1968).

Global Distribution

These forests occur along the North Atlantic Coast in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and possibly Rhode Island (NatureServe 2009).

Best Places to See

  • Emma Rose Elliston Park (Suffolk County)
  • Wildwood State Park (Suffolk County)

Identification Comments

General Description

A hardwood forest with oaks (Quercus spp.) and American beech (Fagus grandifolia) codominant that occurs in dry well-drained, loamy sand of morainal coves of the Atlantic coastal plain. Some occurrences are associated with maritime beech forest. Beech can range from nearly pure stands to as little as about 25% cover.

Characters Most Useful for Identification

The forest is usually codominated by two or more species of oaks, usually black oak (Quercus velutina) and white oak (Q. alba). Scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea) and chestnut oak (Q. montana) are common associates. Red oak (Quercus rubra) may be present at low density and is a key indicator species along with sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and paper birch (Betula papyrifera). There are relatively few shrubs and herbs. Characteristic groundlayer species are Swan's sedge (Carex swanii), Canada mayflower (Maianthemum canadense), white wood aster (Eurybia divaricata), beech-drops (Epifagus virginiana), and false Solomon's seal (Maianthemum racemosum). Typically there is also an abundance of tree seedlings, especially of American beech; beech and oak saplings are often the most abundant "shrubs" and small trees.

Elevation Range

Known examples of this community have been found at elevations between 16 feet and 200 feet.

Best Time to See

During midsummer, the parasitic wildlflower beech-drops, which grows on the roots of beech trees, can be observed in bloom.

Coastal Oak-Beech Forest Images

Classification

International Vegetation Classification Associations

This New York natural community encompasses all or part of the concept of the following International Vegetation Classification (IVC) natural community associations. These are often described at finer resolution than New York's natural communities. The IVC is developed and maintained by NatureServe.

  • American Beech - White Oak - Northern Red Oak Forest (CEGL006377 )

NatureServe Ecological Systems

This New York natural community falls into the following ecological system(s). Ecological systems are often described at a coarser resolution than New York's natural communities and tend to represent clusters of associations found in similar environments. The ecological systems project is developed and maintained by NatureServe.

  • Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain Dry Oak-Hardwood Forest (CES203.475 )

Characteristic Species

Trees > 5m

Acer rubrum

Acer saccharinum (silver maple)

Acer saccharum (sugar maple)

Carya glabra (pignut hickory)

Cornus florida (flowering dogwood)

Fagus grandifolia (American beech)

Juniperus virginiana

Ostrya virginiana (hop hornbeam, ironwood)

Pinus rigida (pitch pine)

Prunus serotina

Quercus alba (white oak)

Quercus coccinea (scarlet oak)

Quercus montana (chestnut oak)

Quercus rubra (northern red oak)

Quercus velutina (black oak)

Sassafras albidum (sassafras)

Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock)

Shrubs 2 - 5m

Carya alba

Fagus grandifolia (American beech)

Lyonia ligustrina

Prunus serotina

Sassafras albidum (sassafras)

Viburnum dentatum

Shrubs < 2m

Acer rubrum

Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry)

Fagus grandifolia (American beech)

Frangula alnus (glossy buckthorn)

Gaylussacia baccata (black huckleberry)

Lonicera japonica (Japanese honeysuckle)

Myrica pensylvanica

Ostrya virginiana (hop hornbeam, ironwood)

Prunus serotina

Sassafras albidum (sassafras)

Smilax rotundifolia (common greenbrier)

Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)

Vaccinium pallidum (hillside blueberry)

Vines

Vitis aestivalis (summer grape)

Herbs

Epifagus virginiana (beech-drops)

Similar Ecological Communities

  • Beech-maple mesic forest (guide)
    Beech-maple mesic forests occur on moister soils than coastal oak-beech forests and have a higher diversity of canopy, shrub, and herbaceous species. Beech-maple mesic forests occur throughout the state and have characteristic regional variants, whereas coastal oak-beech forests occur only on the Atlantic Coastal Plain.
  • Coastal oak-heath forest (guide)
    Coastal oak-heath forest communities occur on similar substrate as coastal oak-beech communities, but the oak-heath type has a dense understory of lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium, V. pallidum) and black huckleberry (Gaylussacia baccata), and does not have significant beech canopy cover.
  • Coastal oak-hickory forest (guide)
    Coastal oak-hickory forests, like coastal oak-beech forests, occur on dry, well-drained loamy sand soils of the Atlantic Coastal Plain, but they have hickory species (Carya alba, C. glabra, or C. ovalis), rather than beech, as a canopy codominant with oaks. In addition, coastal oak-hickory forests often have a more diverse shrub and herb layer than coastal oak-beech forests.
  • Coastal oak-holly forest (guide)
    Coastal oak-holly forest is codominated by black oak, black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), red maple (Acer rubrum) and American beech with abundant holly (Ilex opaca) in the subcanopy and tall shrub layers. American beech is more abundant in coastal oak-beech forest and holly is generally absent.
  • Maritime beech forest (guide)
    Maritime beech forests occur on north-facing exposed bluffs and the back portions of rolling dunes in well-drained fine sands, whereas coastal oak-beech forests occur on loamy sands of morainal coves. These communities may grade into one another. Maritime beech forests, which are dominated by American beech with associated black oak and red maple (Acer rubrum), may be influenced by high winds and salt exposure due to their proximity to the ocean. Trees may have multiple stems or be stunted. Coastal oak-beech forests are not influenced by these maritime processes and have a significant presence of oak species in the tree canopy.

Vegetation

Trees > 5m
90%
Shrubs 2 - 5m
10%
Shrubs < 2m
10%
Vines
1%
Herbs
1%

Percent cover

This figure helps visualize the structure and "look" or "feel" of a typical Coastal Oak-Beech Forest. Each bar represents the amount of "coverage" for all the species growing at that height. Because layers overlap (shrubs may grow under trees, for example), the shaded regions can add up to more than 100%.

Additional Resources

References

Augustine, A.J. and L.E. French. 1998. Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests. Conservation Biology 12:995-1004.

Brodo, Irwin M. 1968. The lichens of Long Island, New York: A vegetational and floristic analysis. New York State Museum Bulletin 410: 1-330.

Busby, Posy E., C. D. Canham, G. Motzkin, and D. R. Foster. 2009. Forest response to chronic hurricane disturbance in coastal New England. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 487-497.

Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/ecocomm2014.pdf

Edinger, Gregory J., D.J. Evans, Shane Gebauer, Timothy G. Howard, David M. Hunt, and Adele M. Olivero (editors). 2002. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY. 136 pp.

Greller, Andrew M. 1977. A classification of mature forests on Long Island, New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 140 (4):376-382.

Houston, D.R. and J. O'Brien. 1983. Beech bark disease. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 75. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.

Knight, T.M. 2003. Effects of herbivory and its timing across populations of Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 90:1207-1214.

Miller, S.G., S.P. Bratton, and J. Hadidian. 1992. Impacts of white-tailed deer on endangered and threatened vascular plants. Natural Areas Journal 12:67-74.

NatureServe. 2009. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. (Data last updated July 17, 2009)

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

Reschke, Carol. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Latham, NY. 96 pp. plus xi.

Rosza, R. and K. Metzler. 1982. Plant communities of Mashomack. In: The Mashomack Preserve Study. Vol. 2: Biological Resources. S. Englebright, ed. The Nature Conservancy, East Hampton, New York.

Sneddon, L., M. Anderson and K. Metzler. 1996. Community alliances and elements of the eastern region. Second draft. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Region Conservation Science, Boston, MA. April 11. 234 pp.

Sneddon, L., M. Anderson, and J. Lundgren. 1998. International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the northeastern United States. July 1998 working draft. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science and Natural Heritage ProgramS of the northeastern United States, Boston, MA. July 1998.

Spies, T.A. and M.G. Turner. 1999. Dynamic forest mosaics. Pages 95-160 in: M. L. Hunter, Jr., editor. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Taylor, Norman. 1923. The vegetation of Long Island, Part I. The vegetation of Montauk: A study of grassland and forest. Memoirs Brooklyn Botanical Garden. 2:1-107.

Links

About This Guide

This guide was authored by: Aissa Feldmann

Information for this guide was last updated on: March 2, 2017

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. Online Conservation Guide for Coastal oak-beech forest. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/coastal-oak-beech-forest/. Accessed November 16, 2019.

Back to top