Eastern Small-footed Myotis

Myotis leibii (Audubon and Bachman, 1842)

Small-footed Myotis
Alan Hicks

Mammalia (Mammals)
Vespertilionidae (Evening Bats and Vesper Bats)
State Protection
Special Concern
Listed as Special Concern by New York State: at risk of becoming Threatened; not listed as Endangered or Threatened, but concern exists for its continued welfare in New York; NYS DEC may promulgate regulations as to the taking, importation, transportation, or possession as it deems necessary.
Federal Protection
Not Listed
State Conservation Status Rank
Critically Imperiled, Imperiled, or Vulnerable in New York - Conservation status is uncertain; could be especially vulnerable, very vulnerable, or vulnerable to disappearing from New York, due to rarity or other factors. More information is needed to assign either S1, S2 or S3.
Global Conservation Status Rank
Apparently Secure globally - Uncommon in the world but not rare; usually widespread, but may be rare in some parts of its range; possibly some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.


Did you know?

The Eastern Small-footed Myotis is the smallest Myotis in the eastern United States. It differs from other bats in that it typically roosts in rock crevices and talus, rather than trees.

State Ranking Justification

Although the species has been previously recorded from 40 hibernacula, there have been only eight locations with 50 or more individuals. Many of the hibernacula contain few individuals. The small number of total individuals statewide and the small number of high-quality occurrences are the primary ranking considerations.

Short-term Trends

Because this species often hides in crevices and may use smaller, unsurveyed hibernacula, there is significant uncertainty surrounding whether the apparent measured declines of 31% (2007-2015) are due to sampling error. It seems likely that populations are stable or declining slightly.

Long-term Trends

Prior to WNS populations were thought to be relatively stable. Trends from historic populations are unknown but this species was always likely relatively uncommon. There is a large margin of error surrounding the hibernacula surveys reporting trends of between 13% (2012) to 30% (2015) decline.

Conservation and Management


Some mines may suffer from collapse or closure and a few cave occurrences are probably threatened or reduced in quality due to the commercialization or frequent winter visitation by spelunkers. The main threat is disturbance during the winter hibernation period and, although this currently does not appear to be a major threat at the best sites (mines), it could be a problem at some of the cave sites. White-nose syndrome (WNS) may not be as big an issue for this species as for other Myotids. Although the species has been shown to get WNS, there is evidence that microbes or a physicological response may be protecting them from the disease. They are also the most cold-tolerant of the Myotis species in New York State which allows them to enter hibernacula later in the fall and emerge earlier in the spring, which may limit their exposure.
Bats may be particularly sensitive to environmental toxins including those found in herbicides and pesticides. Although no studies have targeted small-footed bats directly, elevated levels of persistent organic pollutants including especially PCBs, DDT, Chlordanes, and PBDEs have been found in a similar species, the little brown bat, in the Hudson River Valley in New York (Kannan et al. 2010). The levels found in the bats were only 1 to 3 times less than lethal concentrations reported from previous studies (Kannan et al. 2010). Lesser toxin levels may be expected in small-footed bats since little brown bats typically consume a greater percentage of prey with an aquatic life stage. Bats are highly susceptible to DDT residue and this chemical was widely used as a pesticide to control bat infestations in houses in the 1940s (USGS 2013). It was widely used as an agricultural pesticide in the 1950s and 60s until its agricultural use was banned in 1972. Since DDT is highly persistent (soil half-life is 2-15 years, aquatic half-life is about 150 years) (NPIC 1999), it can pose a threat to bats when there is exposure to trace residues in the environment (USGS 2013). Extensive applications of insecticides and some bio control methods, such as Btk, could also pose an indirect risk to northern myotis by reducing availability of prey.
If proper precautions are not used, cavers and researchers entering hibernacula may cause disturbance that rouses bat colonies or transport the fungus that causes WNS on their clothing (NatureServe 2013). Other potential threats may include climate change, commercial cave development, flooding and hibernacula collapse; habitat loss and fragmentation from development, hydraulic fracturing, and construction of new wind facilities; and direct mortality from wind facilities (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013).

Conservation Strategies and Management Practices

Cave or mine gating should be given serious consideration at sites that may otherwise receive heavy winter usage. Fencing around openings may be sufficient at some of the more remote locations. Gates or fences will need monitoring to ensure that they remain effective. Gates over entrances must be designed in accordance with specifications that allow easy entrance by bats and do not restrict or alter air movement patterns within subterranean systems.

Research Needs

Determination of the percentage of the wintering population that is visible during hibernacula counts is necessary to develop population estimates and trends. Determining the summer distribution and habitat preferences of reproductive females is also a research need (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 2006).



Small-footed bats winter in caves and mines, and openings deep within rock crevices in outcrops. The largest overwintering populations are currently known from mines in the northern part of the state. Several individuals, including a few lactating females, have been mist-netted in deciduous forests during the summer months in southeastern and central New York, but the species is likely to be more widespread in the state during the summer months. Several studies in the northeast and southeast have indicated that Small-footed Myotis roost and form maternity colonies in fractures in rock ledges and talus areas. This type of roosting behavior may contribute to the low numbers observed during winter hibernacula counts in New York because many individuals may not be readily detectable on the cave or mine walls. Instead they may hide within crevices or in piles of rubble on the cave or mine floor.

Associated Ecological Communities

  • Acidic talus slope woodland (guide)
    An open to closed canopy woodland that occurs on talus slopes (slopes of boulders and rocks, often at the base of cliffs) composed of non-calcareous rocks such as granite, quartzite, or schist.
  • Appalachian oak-hickory forest (guide)
    A hardwood forest that occurs on well-drained sites, usually on ridgetops, upper slopes, or south- and west-facing slopes. The soils are usually loams or sandy loams. This is a broadly defined forest community with several regional and edaphic variants. The dominant trees include red oak, white oak, and/or black oak. Mixed with the oaks, usually at lower densities, are pignut, shagbark, and/or sweet pignut hickory.
  • Beech-maple mesic forest (guide)
    A hardwood forest with sugar maple and American beech codominant. This is a broadly defined community type with several variants. These forests occur on moist, well-drained, usually acid soils. Common associates are yellow birch, white ash, hop hornbeam, and red maple.
  • Calcareous cliff community (guide)
    A community that occurs on vertical exposures of resistant, calcareous bedrock (such as limestone or dolomite) or consolidated material; these cliffs often include ledges and small areas of talus.
  • Chestnut oak forest (guide)
    A hardwood forest that occurs on well-drained sites in glaciated portions of the Appalachians, and on the coastal plain. This forest is similar to the Allegheny oak forest; it is distinguished by fewer canopy dominants and a less diverse shrublayer and groundlayer flora. Dominant trees are typically chestnut oak and red oak.
  • Cliff community (guide)
    A community that occurs on vertical exposures of resistant, non-calcareous bedrock (such as quartzite, sandstone, or schist) or consolidated material; these cliffs often include ledges and small areas of talus.
  • Hemlock-northern hardwood forest (guide)
    A mixed forest that typically occurs on middle to lower slopes of ravines, on cool, mid-elevation slopes, and on moist, well-drained sites at the margins of swamps. Eastern hemlock is present and is often the most abundant tree in the forest.
  • Limestone woodland (guide)
    A woodland that occurs on shallow soils over limestone bedrock in non-alvar settings, and usually includes numerous rock outcrops. There are usually several codominant trees, although one species may become dominant in any one stand.
  • Maple-basswood rich mesic forest (guide)
    A species rich hardwood forest that typically occurs on well-drained, moist soils of circumneutral pH. Rich herbs are predominant in the ground layer and are usually correlated with calcareous bedrock, although bedrock does not have to be exposed. The dominant trees are sugar maple, basswood, and white ash.
  • Red cedar rocky summit (guide)
    A community that occurs on warm, dry, rocky ridgetops and summits where the bedrock is calcareous (such as limestone or dolomite, but also marble, amphibolite, and calcsilicate rock), and the soils are more or less calcareous. The vegetation may be sparse or patchy, with numerous lichen covered rock outcrops.
  • Shale cliff and talus community (guide)
    A community that occurs on nearly vertical exposures of shale bedrock and includes ledges and small areas of talus. Talus areas are composed of small fragments that are unstable and steeply sloping; the unstable nature of the shale results in uneven slopes and many rock crevices.
  • Shale talus slope woodland (guide)
    An open to closed canopy woodland that occurs on talus slopes composed of shale. These slopes are rather unstable, and they are usually very well-drained, so the soils are shallow and dry. The canopy cover is usually less than 50%, due to the instability of the substrate.

Associated Species

  • Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus)
  • Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) (guide)
  • Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (guide)
  • Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) (guide)
  • Tri-colored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) (guide)


New York State Distribution

Overall, Small-footed Myotis have been recorded from approximately 26% of all sites surveyed. The species is most often recorded at hibernacula in northern New York with most of the large sites being located in the Adirondacks. Hibernacula are also located in eastern and central New York caves (Albany County, Schoharie County, Montgomery County, and Onondaga County), and southern and western New York mines (Orange County, Ulster County, Putnam County, and Livingston County). Small-footed Myotis have been captured at summer foraging locations in central New York (Onondaga County) and southern New York (Ulster County, Orange County, and Putnam County). The summer range is undoubtedly larger than what is currently recorded.

Global Distribution

The range extends from New England, southeastern Ontario, and southwestern Quebec south and west to southeastern Oklahoma, Arkansas, northern Alabama, northern Georgia, and northwestern South Carolina (Best and Jennings 1997, Menzel et al. 2003). Within this range, the distribution is very spotty, and the bulk of the occurrences and largest populations are in New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and western Virginia. This species is apparently extirpated in Connecticut and Ohio (where it is known from only one specimen). The elevational range extends to at least 700-800 meters in several states and to at least 1,125 meters in Kentucky (see Best and Jennings 1997).

Identification Comments

Identifying Characteristics

This is a very small bat with tiny feet. Measurements are as follows: total length of 72-84 mm, tail length of 30-39 mm, hind foot length 6- 8 mm, forearm length of 30-36 mm, and wingspread of 212-248 mm; the weight of an adult is 3-8 g (Banfield 1974, Godin 1977, Schwartz and Schwartz 1981, Merritt 1987). The dorsal pelage is pale yellowish brown to golden brown, the ears are black, and the face has a black mask. The tragus, a fleshy projection at the entrance to the ear, is long and pointed. There are no prominent chin or nose flaps. The belly hair varies from pale buff to whitish. The bases of the hairs on the back are blackish and the wing and tail membranes are very dark brown. The tail reaches the edge of the interfemoral membrane (the membrane that stretches between the legs of bats that is used for flight and for catching insects). The base of this membrane and the undersurfaces of the wing membranes are sparsely furred. The calcar (a cartilaginous extension of the ankle) has a definitive keel. The sexes are similar in appearance.

Characters Most Useful for Identification

The combination of the small size, golden-yellow pelage, and lack of a mask make this bat readily distinguishable from other species of bats in New York. The small hind foot and long-keeled calcar are also diagnostic.


Mating behavior is similar to that of the Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) (Wimsatt 1945) and so, probably, are other facets of reproduction (Banfield 1974). Breeding may occur in the fall, with the sperm stored in the uterus over the winter. Active gestation lasts probably two months, with a single offspring born annually, probably in early July (Merritt 1987). Survival rates are significantly lower for females (42%) than for males (76%) (van Zyll de Jong 1985). One individual is reported to have lived 12 years (Hitchcock 1965). Colonies are usually small (fewer than 15 individuals), although a few number in the hundreds up to approximately 2,000.


Feeding flights are relatively slow and fluttery and often occur over ponds and streams and along roads.They are known to consume moths (Lepidoptera), true flies (Diptera), and beetles (Coleoptera) (Johnson and Gates 2007, Moosman et al. 2007). Presence of spiders (Araneae) and crickets (Gryllidae) in the diet suggest they may capture some of their prey via gleaning (Moosman et al. 2007).

Best Time to See

Emerges from its daytime retreat shortly after sunset, while there is still some light. In the northeastern U.S., seldom enters hibernation caves before mid-November; departs by March, or possibly earlier in Vermont (Godin 1977).

  • Present
  • Active
  • Reproducing

The time of year you would expect to find Eastern Small-footed Myotis present, active, and reproducing in New York.

Similar Species

  • Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus) (guide)
    The Llittle Brown Bat can be distinguished from the Small-footed Myotis by its slightly larger size, brown-white bi-colored pelage, unkeeled calcar, and lack of a black mask.
  • Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (guide)
    The Northern Myotis can be distinguished from the Small-footed Myotis by its slightly larger size, gray-brown pelage, long ears, unkeeled calcar, and lack of a black mask.
  • Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) (guide)
    The Indiana Bat can be distinguished from the Small-footed Myotis by its slightly larger size, uniform gray-brown pelage, pink nose, and lack of a black mask.
  • Tri-colored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) (guide)
    The Eastern Pipistrelle can be distinguished from the Small-footed Myotis by its pink forearms and lack of a black mask.

Eastern Small-footed Myotis Images


Eastern Small-footed Myotis
Myotis leibii (Audubon and Bachman, 1842)

  • Kingdom Animalia
    • Phylum Craniata
      • Class Mammalia (Mammals)
        • Order Chiroptera (Bats)
          • Family Vespertilionidae (Evening Bats and Vesper Bats)

Additional Resources


Baker, R. H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Michigan State University Press. 642 pp.

Banfield, A. W. F. 1974. The mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. 438 pp.

Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. The University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, Kentucky. 286 pp.

Best, T. L., and J. B. Jennings. 1997. Myotis leibii. Mammalian Species (547):1-6.

Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M. A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.

Chambers, R.E. 1983. Integrating timber and wildlife management. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Dalton, Virginia M. 1987. Distribution, Abundance, and Status of Bats Hibernating in Caves in Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science 38(4): 369-379.

Fenton, M. B. 1972. Distribution and over-wintering of Myotis leibii and Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Ontario. Royal Ontario Museum,, Life Sciences Occas. Pap. (21):1-8.

Godin, A. J. 1977. Wild mammals of New England. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 304 pp.

Gordon, D.C. 1986. Mammals of Jefferson and Lewis counties, New York. Humphrey Press, Canandaigua, N.Y. 135 pp.

Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I & II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.

Hamilton, W.J., Jr. and J.O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.

Handley, C. O., Jr. 1991. Mammals. Pages 539-616 in K. Terwilliger, coordinator. Virginia's endangered species: proceedings of a symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Harvey, M.J., J.S. Altenbach, and T.L. Best. 1999. Bats of the United States. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Little Rock, Arkansas, 64 pp.

Herd, R. M. 1987. Electrophoretic divergence of Myotis leibii and Myotis ciliolabrum (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Can. J. Zool. 65:1857-1860.

Hitchcock, H. B. 1955. A summer colony of the least bat Myotis subulatus leibii (Audubon and Bachman). Canadian Field-Naturalist 69(2):31.

Hitchcock, H. B. 1965. Twenty-three years of bat banding in Ontario and Quebec. Canadian Field Naturalist 79(1):4-14.

Johnson, Joshua B., and J. Edward Gates. 2007. Food habits of Myotis leibii during fall swarming in West Virginia. Northeastern Naturalist 14: 317-322.

Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.

Menzel, J. M., M. A. Menzel, W. M. Ford, J. W. Edwards, S. R. Sheffield, J. C. Kilgo, and M. S. Bunch. 2003. The distribution of the bats of South Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 2:121-152.

Merritt, J. F. 1987. Guide to the mammals of Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Moosman Jr, Paul R., Howard H. Thomas, and Jacques Pierre Veilleux. 2007. Food habits of eastern small-footed bats (Myotis leibii) in New Hampshire.The American Midland Naturalist 158: 354-360.

NYSDEC [online]. 2012. DEC Reports: 2012 Winter Bat Survey Results. Department of Environmental Conservation. <http://www.dec.ny.gov/press/81767.html> (3 February 2014).

New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish, Wildlife, and Marine Resources. 2006. New York State Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Checklist of the amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals of New York State, including their protective status. Nongame Unit, Wildlife Resources Center, Delmar, NY.

Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1981. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. 356 pp.

Tuttle, M. D. 1964. Myotis subulatus in Tennessee. J. Mamm. 45:148-149.

Tuttle, M. D. 1974a. An improved trap for bats. J. Mammal. 55(2):475-477.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. 90-Day finding on a petition to list the eastern small-footed bat and the northern long-eared bat as threatened or endangered. Vol. 76 No. 125, Department of the Interior.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2013. 12-Month finding on a petition to list the eastern small-footed bat and the northern long-eared bat as threatened or endangered; Listing the northern long-eared bat as an endangered species; Proposed rule. Vol. 78 No. 191, Department of the Interior.

Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.

Wimsatt, W. A. 1945. Notes on breeding behavior, pregnancy, and parturition in some vespertilionid bats of the eastern United States. Jounal of Mammalogy 26(1):23-33.

van Zyll de Jong, C. G. 1984. Taxonomic relationships of Nearctic small-footed bats of the Myotis leibii group (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Can. J. Zool. 62:2519-2526.

van Zyll de Jong, C.G. 1985. Handbook of Canadian Mammals. Vol. II, Bats. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 212 pp.


About This Guide

Information for this guide was last updated on: December 13, 2007

Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2024. Online Conservation Guide for Myotis leibii. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/eastern-small-footed-myotis/. Accessed May 26, 2024.