There are only two species of Liriodendron in the world. Both are in the magnolia family and have flowers that resemble tulips. One is characteristic of oak-tulip tree forests in the eastern U.S (Liriodendron tulipifera), the other is native to China (Liriodendron chinense). In these eastern U.S. forests, tulip trees and white pine are the largest trees. They can grow rather tall (60 to 90 feet and sometimes up to 150 feet) and very rapidly. Due to this quality, Native Americans made dugout canoes from tulip tree trunks.
There are less than one hundred occurrences statewide. A few documented occurrences have good viability and several are protected on public land or private conservation land. This community is somewhat limited to the Lower Hudson Valley and western Long Island, and most examples are fragmented and disturbed. The current trend of this community is probably stable for occurrences on public land, or declining slightly elsewhere due to moderate threats related to development pressure. This community has declined substantially from historical numbers likely correlated with past logging, agriculture, and other development.
The acreage of oak-tulip tree forests in New York have probably declined moderately in recent decades as a result of logging, agriculture, and other development. The number of oak-tulip tree forests may have increased slightly from historical numbers as formerly large matrix examples were fragmented by development into numerous large and small patches.
The acreage of oak-tulip tree forests in New York have probably declined substantially from historical numbers likely correlated with past logging, agiculture, and other development. The number of oak-tulip tree forests may have increased substantially from historical numbers as formerly large matrix examples were fragmented by development into numerous large and small patches.
Threats to forests in general include changes in land use (e.g., clearing for development), forest fragmentation (e.g., roads), and invasive species (e.g., insects, diseases, and plants). Other threats may include over-browsing by deer, fire suppression, and air pollution (e.g., ozone and acidic deposition). When occurring in expansive forests, the largest threat to the integrity of oak-tulip tree forests are activities that fragment the forest into smaller pieces. These activities, such as road building and other development, restrict the movement of species and seeds throughout the entire forest, an effect that often results in loss of those species that require larger blocks of habitat (e.g., black bear, bobcat, certain bird species). Additionally, fragmented forests provide decreased benefits to neighboring societies from services these societies often substantially depend on (e.g., clean water, mitigation of floods and droughts, pollination in agricultural fields, and pest control) (Daily et al. 1997). Oak-tulip tree forests are threatened by development (e.g., residential, agricultural, industrial), either directly within the community or in the surrounding landscape. Other threats include habitat alteration (e.g., roads, excessive logging, mining, deer over-browsing), and recreational overuse (e.g., hiking trails, trash dumping). A few oak-tulip tree forests are threatened by invasive species, such as garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), Asiatic bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora).The oak trees in oak-tulip tree forests may be threatened by the non-native gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar), which is one of North America's most devastating forest pests. The gypsy moth is known to feed on the foliage of hundreds of species of plants in North America, but its most common hosts are oaks and aspen. Gypsy moth populations are typically eruptive in North America; in any forest stand densities may fluctuate from near 1 egg mass per ha to over 1,000 per ha. When densities reach very high levels, trees may become completely defoliated. Several successive years of defoliation, along with contributions by other biotic and abiotic stress factors, may ultimately result in tree mortality (McManus et al. 1980, Liebold 2003).
Management should focus on activities that help maintain regeneration of the species associated with this community. Deer have been shown to have negative effects on forest understories (Miller et al. 1992, Augustine & French 1998, Knight 2003) and management efforts should strive to ensure that regenerating trees and shrubs are not so heavily browsed that they cannot replace overstory trees. Avoid cutting old-growth examples and encourage selective logging in areas that are under active forestry.
Strive to minimize fragmentation of large forest blocks by focusing development on forest edges, minimizing the width of roads and road corridors extending into forests, and designing cluster developments that minimize the spatial extent of the development. Development projects with the least impact on large forests and all the plants and animals living within these forests are those developments built on brownfields or other previously developed land. These projects have the added benefit of matching sustainable development practices (for example, see: The President's Council on Sustainable Development 1999 final report, US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification process at http://www.usgbc.org/).
Inventory any remaining large and old-growth examples across the state. Survey for occurrences statewide to advance documentation and classification of oak-tulip tree forests. A statewide review of oak-tulip tree forests is desirable. Continue searching for large sites in good condition (A- to AB-ranked).
Regularly assess the presence and degree of impact that gypsy moth has on this community. Research composition of oak-tulip tree forests statewide in order to characterize variations. Collect sufficient plot data to support the recognition of several distinct oak-tulip tree forest types based on composition, and by ecoregion.
This community is currently known from the lower Hudson Valley primarily within the Hudson Highlands, but also in the Hudson Limestone Valley and western Long Island Coastal Lowland.
This community is found primarily in the Allegheny Plateau and Appalachian Mountain regions of the United States, with possible extensions east and west of those areas, ranging from southeastern New York and New Jersey, and west to Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and southeast Ohio.
Oak tulip-tree forest is a mesophytic hardwood forest community that occurs on moist, well-drained sites in southeastern New York. The dominant trees include a mixture of oaks (Quercus spp.), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), black birch (Betula lenta), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The subcanopy often includes flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), and common understory associates include witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), and lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium, V. pallidum). The herb layer is moderate to sparse and may include New York fern (Thelypteris novaboracenis), white wood aster (Eurybia divaricata), and Solomon's plume (Maianthemum racemosum).
A moist, well-drained, closed-canopy hardwood forest with codominating tulip tree and oak species. The subcanopy often includes flowering dogwood, and other common understory associates include witch hazel, sassafras, and lowbush blueberry.
Known examples of this community have been found at elevations between 10 feet and 1,360 feet.
During July, two species of lowbush blueberry in the understory of this community bear fruit. In autumn, the foliage of the hardwood canopy species and the understory shrubs turn bright colors.
This New York natural community encompasses all or part of the concept of the following International Vegetation Classification (IVC) natural community associations. These are often described at finer resolution than New York's natural communities. The IVC is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
This New York natural community falls into the following ecological system(s). Ecological systems are often described at a coarser resolution than New York's natural communities and tend to represent clusters of associations found in similar environments. The ecological systems project is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
Acer saccharum (sugar maple)
Betula lenta (black birch)
Fagus grandifolia (American beech)
Fraxinus americana (white ash)
Liriodendron tulipifera (tulip tree, tulip poplar, yellow poplar)
Quercus alba (white oak)
Quercus montana (chestnut oak)
Quercus rubra (northern red oak)
Quercus velutina (black oak)
Cornus florida (flowering dogwood)
Hamamelis virginiana (witch-hazel)
Lindera benzoin (spicebush)
Sassafras albidum (sassafras)
Vaccinium angustifolium (common lowbush blueberry)
Vaccinium pallidum (hillside blueberry)
Viburnum acerifolium (maple-leaved viburnum)
Eurybia divaricata (white wood-aster)
Polystichum acrostichoides (Christmas fern)
Thelypteris noveboracensis (New York fern)
This figure helps visualize the structure and "look" or "feel" of a typical Oak-Tulip Tree Forest. Each bar represents the amount of "coverage" for all the species growing at that height. Because layers overlap (shrubs may grow under trees, for example), the shaded regions can add up to more than 100%.
Augustine, A.J. and L.E. French. 1998. Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests. Conservation Biology 12:995-1004.
Daily, G.C., S. Alexander, P.R. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P. Matson, H.A. Mooney, S. Postel, S.H. Schneider, D. Tilman, and G.M. Woodwell. 1997. Ecosystem Services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues In Ecology 2:1-16.
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. https://www.nynhp.org/ecological-communities/
Edinger, Gregory J., D.J. Evans, Shane Gebauer, Timothy G. Howard, David M. Hunt, and Adele M. Olivero (editors). 2002. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY. 136 pp.
Greller, Andrew M. 1977. A classification of mature forests on Long Island, New York. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 140 (4):376-382.
Hagan, J.M. and A.A. Whitman. 2004. Late-successional Forest:A disappearing age class and implications for biodiversity. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences. 4 pp.
Knight, T.M. 2003. Effects of herbivory and its timing across populations of Trillium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 90:1207-1214.
Liebold, S. 2003. Gypsy Moth in North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Morgantown, WV.
McManus, M, N. Schneebergerm R. Reardon, and G. Mason. 1980. Gypsy Moth. Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet 162. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
Miller, S.G., S.P. Bratton, and J. Hadidian. 1992. Impacts of white-tailed deer on endangered and threatened vascular plants. Natural Areas Journal 12:67-74.
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2021. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.
Reschke, Carol. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Latham, NY. 96 pp. plus xi.
Rosza, R. and K. Metzler. 1982. Plant communities of Mashomack. In: The Mashomack Preserve Study. Vol. 2: Biological Resources. S. Englebright, ed. The Nature Conservancy, East Hampton, New York.
The President's Council on Sustainable Development. 1999. Towards a Sustainable America: Advancing Prosperity, Opportunity, and a Healthy environment for the 21st Century. Washington, DC. 97 pp. plus appendices.
This guide was authored by: Jennifer Garret
Information for this guide was last updated on: May 5, 2021
Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2021. Online Conservation Guide for Oak-tulip tree forest. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/oak-tulip-tree-forest/. Accessed July 26, 2021.