White-tailed deer spend much of their time during the winter months in northern white cedar swamps, munching on their favorite winter food. Northern white cedar is not regenerating well in some of these swamps due to this over browsing.
There are several hundred occurrences statewide. Some documented occurrences have good viability and many are protected on public land or private conservation land. This community is scattered and essentially limited to the northern half of the state, and includes several large, high quality examples. The current trend of this community is probably stable for occurrences on public land, or declining slightly elsewhere due to moderate threats that include alteration of the natural hydrology (primarily by beaver) and invasive species.
The number and acreage of northern white cedar swamps in New York have probably declined slightly, or remained stable, in recent decades as a result of wetland protection regulations. A few examples may have declined due to flooding by beaver.
The number and acreage of northern white cedar swamps in New York have probably declined substantially from historical numbers likely correlated with agricultural and development.
Northern white cedar swamps are threatened by development (e.g., agriculture, residential, roads, railroads), habitat alteration (e.g., excessive logging, sediment/pollution run-off, plantations, trash dumping), and recreational overuse (e.g., hiking trails, horse trails, ATVs, campgrounds). Alteration to the natural hydrological regime is also a threat to this community (e.g., impoundments, blocked culverts, beaver). Several northern white cedar swamps are threatened by invasive species, such as purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and reedgrass (Phragmites australis). Timber harvest is a threat because white cedar is naturally resistant to rot. It has been used for shingles and posts, and is a valuable tree for wood products (Sorenson et al. 1998), thus making this community an important source for this tree.The emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) is an Asian beetle that infests and kills North American ash trees. All native ash trees are susceptible, including white ash, green ash, and black ash. In New York, emerald ash borer has been found mostly south of the Adirondack Mountains, but in 2017 it was recorded in Franklin and St. Lawrence Counties. Natural communities dominated or co-dominated by ash trees would likely be most impacted by emerald ash borer invasion.
Where practical, establish and maintain a natural wetland buffer to reduce storm-water, pollution, and nutrient run-off, while simultaneously capturing sediments before they reach the wetland. Buffer width should take into account the erodibility of the surrounding soils, slope steepness, and current land use. Wetlands protected under Article 24 are known as New York State "regulated" wetlands. The regulated area includes the wetlands themselves, as well as a protective buffer or "adjacent area" extending 100 feet landward of the wetland boundary (NYS DEC 1995). If possible, minimize the number and size of impervious surfaces in the surrounding landscape. Avoid habitat alteration within the wetland and surrounding landscape. For example, roads and trails should be routed around wetlands, and ideally not pass through the buffer area. If the wetland must be crossed, then bridges and boardwalks are preferred over filling. Restore past impacts, such as removing obsolete impoundments and ditches in order to restore the natural hydrology. Prevent the spread of invasive exotic species into the wetland through appropriate direct management, and by minimizing potential dispersal corridors, such as roads.
When considering road construction and other development activities minimize actions that will change what water carries and how water travels to this community, both on the surface and underground. Water traveling over-the-ground as run-off usually carries an abundance of silt, clay, and other particulates during (and often after) a construction project. While still suspended in the water, these particulates make it difficult for aquatic animals to find food; after settling to the bottom of the wetland, these particulates bury small plants and animals and alter the natural functions of the community in many other ways. Thus, road construction and development activities near this community type should strive to minimize particulate-laden run-off into this community. Water traveling on the ground or seeping through the ground also carries dissolved minerals and chemicals. Road salt, for example, is becoming an increasing problem both to natural communities and as a contaminant in household wells. Fertilizers, detergents, and other chemicals that increase the nutrient levels in wetlands cause algae blooms and eventually an oxygen-depleted environment where few animals can live. Herbicides and pesticides often travel far from where they are applied and have lasting effects on the quality of the natural community. So, road construction and other development activities should strive to consider: 1. how water moves through the ground, 2. the types of dissolved substances these development activities may release, and 3. how to minimize the potential for these dissolved substances to reach this natural community.
Survey for occurrences statewide to advance documentation and classification of northern white cedar swamps. A statewide review of northern white cedar swamps is desirable, similar to the studies done in New Hampshire (Sperduto and Engstom 1998) and Vermont (Sorenson et al. 1998). Continue searching for large sites in good condition especially those over 100 acres.
Research composition of northern white cedar swamps statewide in order to characterize variations reported in nearby states (Sorenson et al. 1998, Sperduto and Engstrom 1998). Collect sufficient plot data to support the recognition of several distinct northern white cedar swamp types based on composition and by ecoregion.
This community is scattered and essentially limited to the northern half of the state. It is concentrated in the Great Lakes Ecoregion, but also common in the Adirondack Subsection of the Northern Appalachian Ecoregion where it is represented by large patch occurrences. There are scattered very small patch examples at the northern fringe of the Lower New England Ecoregion, Tug Hill Subsection of the Northern Appalachian Ecoregion, and the High Allegheny Plateau Ecoregion.
The range of this community is probably limited to the Northeast United States and Great Lakes basins, and southeastern Canada. The range is estimated to span north to central Ontario and Quebec, west to Minnesota, south to the Southern Tier of New York, and east to New Brunswick.
A rich conifer or mixed swamp that occurs on organic soils in cool, poorly drained depressions in central and northern New York and along lakes and streams in the northern half of the state. These swamps are often spring fed or enriched by seepage of cold, minerotrophic groundwater, resulting in a stable water table and continually saturated soils. The characteristic tree is northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis), which makes up more than 30% of the canopy cover; characteristic short shrubs include dwarf raspberry and red osier dogwood. The surface of the peatland typically has small mounds and depressions called hummocks and hollows that are formed by decaying downed trees and tip-up mounds. Mosses and liverworts are diverse and abundant.
A forested peatland that is characterized by northern white cedar, which makes up 30% or more of the tree canopy and tall shrub cover.
Known examples of this community have been found at elevations between 100 feet and 1,909 feet.
Northern white cedar, hemlock, balsam fir, and red maple are often found in a northern white cedar swamp; the striking contrast between the evergreens and the red maple's seasonal color can be enjoyed in the fall. The community also contains a number of herbaceous species that bloom in the spring (starflower, bunchberry, Canada mayflower, and blue bead lily) as well as a diverse assortment of mosses and liverworts that are beautiful year-round.
This New York natural community encompasses all or part of the concept of the following International Vegetation Classification (IVC) natural community associations. These are often described at finer resolution than New York's natural communities. The IVC is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
This New York natural community falls into the following ecological system(s). Ecological systems are often described at a coarser resolution than New York's natural communities and tend to represent clusters of associations found in similar environments. The ecological systems project is developed and maintained by NatureServe.
Abies balsamea (balsam fir)
Betula alleghaniensis (yellow birch)
Fraxinus nigra (black ash)
Larix laricina (tamarack)
Picea mariana (black spruce)
Pinus strobus (white pine)
Thuja occidentalis (northern white cedar, arbor vitae)
Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock)
Cornus sericea (red-osier dogwood)
Rubus pubescens (dwarf raspberry)
Aralia nudicaulis (wild sarsaparilla)
Caltha palustris (marsh-marigold)
Carex leptalea (bristle-stalked sedge)
Carex trisperma (three-fruited sedge)
Clintonia borealis (blue bead-lily)
Coptis trifolia (gold-thread)
Cornus canadensis (bunchberry)
Glyceria striata (fowl manna grass)
Gymnocarpium dryopteris (oak fern)
Impatiens capensis (spotted jewelweed, spotted touch-me-not)
Mitella nuda (naked mitrewort, naked bishop's-cap)
Onoclea sensibilis (sensitive fern)
This figure helps visualize the structure and "look" or "feel" of a typical Northern White Cedar Swamp. Each bar represents the amount of "coverage" for all the species growing at that height. Because layers overlap (shrubs may grow under trees, for example), the shaded regions can add up to more than 100%.
Anderson, K.L. and D.J. Leopold. 2002. The role of canopy gaps in maintaining vascular plant diversity at a forested wetland in New York State. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 129(3), 238-250.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C. 131 pp.
Curtis, J.D. 1946. Preliminary observations on northern white cedar in Maine. Ecology 27(1):23-36.
Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero (editors). 2014. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke’s Ecological Communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY. http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/wildlife_pdf/ecocomm2014.pdf
Edinger, Gregory J., D.J. Evans, Shane Gebauer, Timothy G. Howard, David M. Hunt, and Adele M. Olivero (editors). 2002. Ecological Communities of New York State. Second Edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's Ecological Communities of New York State. (Draft for review). New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY. 136 pp.
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. New York Natural Heritage Program Databases. Albany, NY.
New York Natural Heritage Program. No date. Field forms database: Electronic field data storage and access for New York Heritage ecology, botany, and zoology. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Albany, NY.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1995. Freshwater Wetlands: Delineation Manual. July 1995. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Division of Fish, Wildlife, and Marine Resources. Bureau of Habitat. Albany, NY.
Reschke, Carol. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Latham, NY. 96 pp. plus xi.
Seischab, F.K. 1984. Plant community development in the Byron-Bergen Swamp: marl-bed vegetation. Can. J. Bot. 62: 1006-1017.
Shanks, R.E. 1966. An ecological survey of the vegetation of Monroe County, New York. Proc. Rochester Academy Sci. 11:108-252.
Sorenson, E., B. Engstrom, M. Lapin, R. Popp, and S. Parren. 1998. Northern white cedar swamps and red maple-northern white cedar swamps of Vermont: some sites of ecological significance. Vermont Nongame and Natural Heritage Program, Waterbury, Vermont.
Sperduto, D.D. and B. Engstrom. 1998. Northern white cedar swamps of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Inventory, Concord, N.H.
This guide was authored by: Aissa Feldmann
Information for this guide was last updated on: March 22, 2017
Please cite this page as:
New York Natural Heritage Program. 2019. Online Conservation Guide for Northern white cedar swamp. Available from: https://guides.nynhp.org/northern-white-cedar-swamp/. Accessed January 18, 2019.